Peer Review History: Constraints Faced by Paddy Growers in Using Information and Communication Technologies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. T. Muthukumar, Bharathiar University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Somdutt Tripathi, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology Banda, India.

(2) Makam Swetha, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debashis Dash, C V Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, India.

(2) Sayed Halaly Mousa El Nayal, School of Medicine, Ahfad University for Women, Sudan.

(3) SWSB Dasanayaka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somdutt Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Makam Swetha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Matrix-Based Approach to Combinatorial Identities Involving Binomial Coefficients and Stirling Numbers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohsen Mohammadi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Debajit Sensarma, India.

(3) Awatif Rouijel, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debajit Sensarma, Vivekananda Mission Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohsen Mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debajit Sensarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Awatif Rouijel, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Effect of Foliar Application of Different Chemicals on Yield and Physical Characteristics of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Hisar Safeda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rania Abdelzaher, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, Collage of Agriculture, Iraq.

(2) Mrinal Choudhury, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rania Abdelzaher, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swatantra Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of General and Specific Combining Ability for Growth Parameters at Seedling Stage in Mulberry (Morus spp.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Iqra Rafiq, SKUAST_K, India.

(2) Apurba Pal, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hafeeza Amna Saleem, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iqra Rafiq, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Apurba Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Current Status and Implications of New Invasive Thrips, Thrips parvispinus (Karny) in Chilli

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) R Varatharajan, Manipur University, India.

(2) Prince Sahu, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sushil Kumar, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R Varatharajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation and Treatment of Lower Respiratory Bacterial Infection in Dog

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

(2) V.P. Kukhar, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, MAFSU, Parbhani, India.

(2) Malancus Razvan Nicolae, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Srinivas Sathapathy, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaikh Salahuddin Shaikh Rafiuddin, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malancus Razvan Nicolae, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Biofertilizers and Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Garlic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Ashish Shivran, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasser Mohammad Mohammad Osman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Shivran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Phosphorus and Zinc Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar Dwivedi, College of Post-Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University-Imphal, India.

(2) Rajesh Kumar, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ingle Sagar Nandulal, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Saka Habeebah Adewunmi, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Kumar Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK): A Cellular Energy Sensor and the Guardian of Metabolism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anwar Ali Abdulla, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, India.

(3) Ege Sevinc Yesil, Istanbul Health and Technology University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.77/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anwar Ali Abdulla, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ege Sevinc Yesil, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association of Poor Sleep Quality with Ischemic Heart Disease

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

(2) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, F. Perinei Hospital, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Anamika.Pk, SBMCH, India.

(2) Shivani Agarwal, Moradabad Educational Trust Group of Institutions Faculty of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Remalli Rohan, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

(2) Sima Patra, University: West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Ravel Institute of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anamika.Pk, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivani Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA