Author Archive: admin

Peer Review History: Primary Evans Syndrome with Concurrent Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia and Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Rare Autoimmune Hematological Challenge

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Alameri, Yemen.

(2) Batool Butt, Foundation University of School and Health Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divya M, Rela Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Alameri, Yemen) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Batool Butt, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Study on Marketing Efficiency and Constraints Faced by the Horse Gram Growers in Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekonnen Aklilu Tesfaye, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Binoy Tripura, Krishi Viyan Kendra Gomati, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Indonesia.

(2) Rita Kapil Narvariya, Jawahar Lal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) Vikram Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mekonnen Aklilu Tesfaye, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Binoy Tripura, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing Microbial Diversity at Watering Points Along the Isiukhu River, Kenya Using 16S rRNA Sequencing

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Morka Emmanuel, Delta State University, Nigeria.

(2) Sourav Ghosh, Rai Technology University, India.

(3) Nipun Bariya, A P J Abdul Kalam Govt. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agus Sabdono, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Morka Emmanuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sourav Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nipun Bariya, India) | File 1 | File 2 

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2 

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Impact of Control Methods Based on Local Products Against the infestation of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. on Millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] in a farming Environment in the North Côte d’Ivoire

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bargale Sushant Sukumar, Sdm College Of Ayurveda And Hospital, India.

(2) M. Raveendra Reddy, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(3) Rama Shankar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Munny Chinyo, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bargale Sushant Sukumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Raveendra Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Role of Omics Technologies in Pet Food Science: Advancing Nutrition, Health, and Safety

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sababa Fatima, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

(2) Serol Korkmaz, Pendik Veterinary Control Institute, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sababa Fatima, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serol Korkmaz, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Micro-nutrients and Plant Growth Regulator on Management of Fruit Drop in Bael (Aegle marmelos Correa) cv. Narendra Bael-9 under Ayodhya Region

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarita R. Sharma, Indus University, India.

(2) Snober Aftab, J&K (SKUAST-Kashmir), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mhaiskar Priya Rajendra, Forest College and Research Institute, SKLTSHU, India.

(2) Shivani Sharma, Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be)University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarita R. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snober Aftab, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Investigating the Best Growth Medium for Dragon Fruit Propagation (Hylocereus polyrhizus)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Lhingneivah Chongloi, Institute of Pesticide Formulation Technology, India.

(2) Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lhingneivah Chongloi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effects of Fortification of Fermented Parkia biglobosa Seeds with Spices on Shelf Life and Sensory Evaluation of the Condiment

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asif Wali, Assistant Professor, Karakoram International University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bh. Sarvani, Agricultural College, Bapatla (ANGRAU), India.

(2) G. Hariharan, Malla Reddy University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bh. Sarvani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Hariharan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to various levels and methods of nano DAP application on growth and yield.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuldeep Singh, RTMNU Nagpur, India.

(2) Payal N. Bhautik, Priyadarshini College of Engineering Nagpur, India.

(3) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuldeep Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Payal N. Bhautik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effects of lead acetate toxicity in respect to histological, cytogenetical, hematological parameters and subsequent amelioration by green tea on experimental albino rats

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Farjana Sultana, College of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT – International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa Bhargava, Biyani Girls College, India.

(2) Arizo Jan, SKUAST- Kashmir (Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shilpa Bhargava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arizo Jan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA