Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, Division National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Christina Cathrine, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(2) Chetariya Chana P, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Christina Cathrine, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chetariya Chana P, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Srisan Phupaboon, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Saugata Sasmal, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srisan Phupaboon, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saugata Sasmal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pietro Scicchitano, Hospital “F. Perinei” Altamura (Ba), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghulam Mustafa, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Mumux Mirani, Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghulam Mustafa, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mumux Mirani, India.) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Chiranjeeb Dey, Serampore College, India.

(2) Kaushik V, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chiranjeeb Dey,  India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kaushik V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Senthil Kumar, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College & Hospitals, Salem, India.

(2) Yogesh Kumar Sarin, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Senthil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar Sarin, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam, India.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(3) Dr. Sule Isin, Ege University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Afeez Tunde Jinadu, Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research, Nigeria.

(2) Neertu Gidwani, Mumbai University, India.

(3) Jithin Scaria, Nilgiri College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Afeez Tunde Jinadu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neertu Gidwani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jithin Scaria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ersin Ozeren, Aksaray University Faculty of Medicine, Turkiye.

(2) Shilpa Anil Gaikwad, Bharati Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Mosimabale Joe Balogun, University college Hospital, Ibadan, and College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ersin Ozeren, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa Anil Gaikwad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mosimabale Joe Balogun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Meshesha Zewdie Amare, Ethiopian Civil Service University, Ethiopia.

(2) Md Rokibul Hasan, Gannon University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meshesha Zewdie Amare,  Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Rokibul Hasan, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Olushola Olorunfemi Eseyin, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Ehab Ibrahim, Agricultural Research Center , Egypt.

(3) Asaad Sh. M. Alhesnawi, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olushola Olorunfemi Eseyin, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ehab Ibrahim, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asaad Sh. M. Alhesnawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Zabid Al Riyadh, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zabid Al Riyadh, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA