Peer Review History: Preservice Teachers’ Assumptions and Motives to Become Teachers: Hope and Professionalism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Safi Ullah, Qurtuba University, Pakistan.

(2) Ng Chee Hoe, Teacher Education Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chin Chee Keong, Institute Of Teacher Education Malaysia Tuanku Bainun Campus, Malaysia.

(2) Enrico D. Medina, Dr. Aurelio Mendoza Memorial Colleges, Philippines.

(3) Mohamed Nasir, Irushadhiyya School, Maldives.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Safi Ullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ng Chee Hoe, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Jhum cultivation in relation to slope pattern and elevation in Phek District of Northeast India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiran Kotyal, Institute of Agri-Business Management, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, India.

(2) Samrat Banerjee, Sarala Birla University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiran Kotyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samrat Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Anxiety and Satisfaction among Senior Citizens in India’s Unorganised Sector: An Evidence from Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanthi Reena Williams, Vidya Vikas Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Adbdulakim Erbo Gobena, Bule Hora University, Ethiopia.

(3) Amrita Baid More, Medi-Caps University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bindiya Tater, Medicaps University, Indore, India.

(2) Njoku. Chinesom, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanthi Reena Williams, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adbdulakim Erbo Gobena, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amrita Baid More, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Evaluation of an IoT-Integrated Solar-Powered Cold Storage System for Post-Harvest Preservation of Perishable Produce

Editor(s):

(1) Professor, Cheng-Fu Yang, National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sohail Bux, Rkdf University, India.

(2) Seema Vishwakarma, Vidyalankar School of Information Technology, India.

(3) Imad Eldin Saeed, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mallikarjuna, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

(2) Pradeepto Pal, College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University (Imphal) Thenzawl, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sohail Bux, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seema Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Imad Eldin Saeed, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Coagulant Performance of Banana Tree Trunk and Banana Leaf Biomass for Water Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National university of Colombia, Colombia.

(2)Dr. D.B. Jani, Gujarat Technological University, GTU, Ahmedabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Divyaa Sreekumar, Narayana Education Institute, India.

(2) Syeda Khair-ul-Bariyah, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.K.Sivakumar, Sri Venkateshwara College Of Pharmacy, Pondicherry University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divyaa Sreekumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syeda Khair-ul-Bariyah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-driven Innovations in the Indian Healthcare System: An Update (2025)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, GITAM University, India.

(2) Oluomachi Eunice Ejiofor, Austin Peay State University, USA.

(3) B.V. Rama Krishna, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(4) S L Ravishankar, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adari Ramesh, ACU (Adichunchunagiri university), India.

(2) Chaitran Chakilam, USA.

(3) Faten Imad Ali, AL-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(4) Himanshu Agarwal, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(5) Temilade Oluwatoyin Adesokan-Imran, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(6) Vala Mehryar Alviri, Iran University of Scienc and Technology, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluomachi Eunice Ejiofor, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B.V. Rama Krishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S L Ravishankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Awareness and Utilization of ICT Tools among Farmers in Chitradurga District: A Socio Economic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Lbrn Charis O. Onuoha, Nigeria.

(2) Uswatun Hasana Hashi , Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Bai Koyu, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ukaoha Christiana Amarachi, University Of Florida, United State.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lbrn Charis O. Onuoha, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Uswatun Hasana Hashi , Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bridging Competency and Training Outcomes: An Evaluation of Life Support Courses via the Dubai Health Authority (DHA) Framework

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Olakunle Saheed Soyege, United States.

(2) Ola Mousa, Minia University, Egypt.

(3) Daniel Lungu, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olakunle Saheed Soyege, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ola Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Daniel Lungu, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Groundnut Germplasm for Late Leaf Spot Resistance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

(2) T. Thilagavathi, St. Joseph’s College(A), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Thilagavathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Structure and Composition of Intertidal Halophytes Vegetation by Using Phytosociological Parameters: A Study along the Gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Slamet Arif Susanto, Universitas Papua, Indonesia.

(2) Ashish Kar, The Energy and Resources Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joshila Grace  L.K, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Slamet Arif Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA