Peer Review History: Phytochemical Profiling and HPLC Quantification of Bioactive Compounds in Hyptis suaveolens, Cymbopogon citratus, and Eucalyptus globulus from Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Endang Tri Wahyuni, Gadhah Mada University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Nambu Mahalakshmi, India.

(2) Akeem Olayinka Busari, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Brazil.

(3) Fahad Said, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

(4) Susinjan Bhattacharya, The Neotia University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khursheed Ur Rahman , Hazara University, Pakistan.

(2) Nosheen Naseem, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.02/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Nambu Mahalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akeem Olayinka Busari, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fahad Said, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Susinjan Bhattacharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the Bloodstream as Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Masumeh Jalalvand, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences,Iran.

(2) Igor Galaychuk, Ternopil National Medical University, Ukraine.

(3) Jitendra Kumar Chaurasia, Ashoka Institute of Technology and Management Varanasi, India.

(4) Cristian Iorga, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masumeh Jalalvand, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Igor Galaychuk, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jitendra Kumar Chaurasia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Cristian Iorga, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Turmeric Powder-supplemented Diets on Growth Performance and Feeding Economics in Konkan Kanyal Goat Kids

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Jonatan Mikhail Del Solar Velarde, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil.

(2) Ir. Budi Rahayu Tanama , Udayana University, Indonesia.

(3) Cayetano Navarrete-Molina, Technological University of Rodeo, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jonatan Mikhail Del Solar Velarde, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ir. Budi Rahayu Tanama, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cayetano Navarrete-Molina, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Host range of Bacteriophage Filtrates from Soil Targeting Xanthomonas vasicola pv. musacearum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akankhya Guru, Janta Vedic College, Baraut (Baghpat); affiliated to CCS University, India.

(2) Antony Lawrence Andrews, School of Natural and Physical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Papua New Guinea.

(3) Farkad Hawas Musa, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(4) Sourav Ghosh, Rai Technology University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Viability of Pangasius Aquaculture in HDPE-Lined Farm Ponds: Evidence from Belagavi District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) CAKPO Romuald Arthur, Republic of Benin.

(2) Bagus Dwi Hari Setyono, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cresencio c. Cabuga jr, Caraga State University, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (CAKPO Romuald Arthur, Republic of Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bagus Dwi Hari Setyono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J.Ch. to JSRR from JEAI | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Macro-Micro Morphological and Phytochemical Characterization of Physalis angulata L

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Meghali Kalita, Gauhati University, India.

(2) Abba Sunday, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enas AbdulSahib Badi, Iraq.

(2) Kiruba Mohandoss, India.

(3) R Devika, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meghali Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abba Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Assessment of Amino Acids in Phytogenic Mixtures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Dr. Chunying Li, Georgia State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amina Mohamed Saleh, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI) , Egypt.

(2) Ruth N Wanjau,n Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(3) G.Sivaperumal, Dhirajlal Gandhi College of Technology , INDIA.

(4) AMARJEET KUMAR, SASARAM (VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Hema, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, College of Fish Nutrition and Food Technology, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Panchakarla Sedyaaw, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(4) Sandeep Tripathi, India.

(5) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Technology and Maritime Business of Balik Diwa, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amina Mohamed Saleh, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruth N Wanjau, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G.Sivaperumal, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (AMARJEET KUMAR, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Growth Performance of Paddy Straw Mushroom (Volvariella volvacea (Bull.) Singer 1951) on Locally Available Agro-Wastes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, College of Science Engineering and Technology and  Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anto Rashwin A, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mykola Kovalov, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mukhtar Ahmed, Govt. College Sokasan, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anto Rashwin A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mykola Kovalov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Urinary and Blood microRNAs miR-21, miR-141 and miR-375 as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Januaris Mwanthi Mukaa, Kenya.

(2) Sushanta Kumar Sahoo, Bareilly International University, India.

(3) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

(4) Chima G Ofoha, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ezinne Janefrances Nwonu, Nigeria.

(2) Ketireddi Dinendraram, NTRUHS, India.

(3) Numan Majeed, Qatif Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Hamid Reza Soltani, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Januaris Mwanthi Mukaa, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushanta Kumar Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Chima G Ofoha, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Posterior Myopexy (Fadenoperation) Combined with Conventional Horizontal Strabismus Surgery for Esotropia with Distance–Near Incomitance: A Retrospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr Achyut N Pandey, Medical Science and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezinne C. Nkeremuzor, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Abhishek Onkar, AIIMS, India.

(3) Sankhajyoti Saha, India.

(4) Ankit S. Varshney, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Tripathi, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Kausika Garapati, India.

(3) Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Egypt.

(4) Patricia Durán Ospina, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Ecuador.

(5) Ragni Kumari, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences (UPUMS), India.

(6) Sheheli Jesmin, Bangladesh Medical University , Bangladesh.

(7) T. Thuileiphy, AIIMS Jodhpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezinne C. Nkeremuzor, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Onkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sankhajyoti Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ankit S. Varshney, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA