Peer Review History: Identification of microorganisms involved in cocoa fermentation in Togo and evaluation of their impact on the quality of the derived product

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagadeesh. U, India.

(2) Arpita Mukherjee, Sai College, Sector-6 Bhilai, India.

(3) Pragya Kulkarni, Govt. V.Y.T. PG Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amira Mohammed-Roshdy Ibrahim Ibrahim Asar, Egypt.

(2) Paranthaman Ramamoorthy, Vignan’s foundation for science, Technology And Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagadeesh. U, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arpita Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pragya Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Potency of Novel Furan/Thiophenyl-Tetrahydronaphtho Triazoles as Antimicrobials and Antioxidants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasilii Graur, Institute of Chemistry, Moldova State University, Republic of Moldova.

(2) Asma Shahbaz, KFUEIT, Pakistan.

(3) Mohammad M. Al-Tufah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasilii Graur, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asma Shahbaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad M. Al-Tufah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long-Term Influence of Fertilizer and Manure Application on Soil Physical Health and Rice Productivity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Abu Feyisa Dejenu, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Ethiopian.

(2) Tahir Saleem, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amir Bahrami, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abu Feyisa Dejenu, Ethiopian) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tahir Saleem, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ABO, Rhesus Blood Groups and Haemoglobin Genotype Pattern of the Undergraduate Students in Ekpoma, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Borna Safari-Kish, Islamic Azad University of Najafabad, Iran.

(2) Edy Haryanto, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Borna Safari-Kish, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Edy Haryanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Pharmacognostical Evaluation and Phytochemical Profile of Upodika (Basella rubra Linn.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Makhabbah Jamilatun, Health Polytechnic of Health Ministry Surakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.

(3) Suman Jain, Government Medical College, Hanumangarh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Makhabbah Jamilatun, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suman Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Teachers’ Perceptions on Walk-in classroom observation and its Influence on Instructional Practices and Pedagogical Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Vlasta Hus, University of Maribor, Slovenia.

(2) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Keerthana, Sri Sairam Engineering College, India.

(2) Nemia M. Galang, President Ramon Magsaysay State University (PRMSU), Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Keerthana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nemia M. Galang, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effectiveness of Neem (Azadirachta indica Juss) and Aloe Vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) Leaf Extracts against Cucumber Aphids (Myzus persicae Sulzer) and Melon Flies (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillet) in a Field Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fakhrul Islam Monshi, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand R. Prajapati, Kantaben Kashiram Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Research, India.

(2) Maan Abdul Azeez Shafeeq, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Sherif Mohammed Shawky, University of Sadat City, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Pitti,University of Panam, Panama.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anand R. Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maan Abdul Azeez Shafeeq, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sherif Mohammed Shawky, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Insect Fauna of Bhimbandh Wildlife Sanctuary, Bihar, India: A Baseline Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Harsh Vishwakarma, Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IIT Indore), India.

(2) Ravikumar D. Dodiya, Uka Tarsadia University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R. Valliappan, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravikumar D. Dodiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Climatic Factors on Arthropod Pests and Associated Natural Enemies of Chilli (Capsicum annuum)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Saritha Pendlikatla, SGS Arts College Tirupati, India.

(2) Theodore Munyuli, DR Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amer J. A. Al-Gerrawy, University of Wasit, Iraq.

(2) Yayan Apriyana, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saritha Pendlikatla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theodore Munyuli, DR Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Determining Awardee Farmers’ Decision Making: A Principal Component Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers: 

(1) Aelena Takhellambam, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Shivani Jha, ICAR- NRC for Makhana, India.

(3) Pankaj Kumar, University of Allahabad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Meghna Jain, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology & Sciences, India.

(2) P.B. Dharmasena, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aelena Takhellambam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivani Jha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pankaj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA