Author Archive: admin

Peer Review History: Agency and Representation of Female Characters in Selected African Literary Texts: A Study of Agency in Selected Texts of African Literature

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadaf Mubeen, University of Education Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Ridha’a Ali J, Babylon University, Iraq.

(3) Charity Ashimem Angya, Benue State University Makurdi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadaf Mubeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ridha’a Ali J, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Charity Ashimem Angya, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Biofertilizers Based on Mycorrhizal Fungi (Rhizophagus intraradices) and Aquatic Ferns (Azolla filiculoïdes) on Agromorphological Parameters of Chilli Pepper (Capsicum chinense L.) Grown on Distric Plinthic Ferralsol in Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Moreira Martine Ramon Felipe, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanja Kajic, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

(2) Zichen Wang, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanja Kajic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zichen Wang, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Automatic Orientation of Student Candidates Based on Memory-based Collaborative Filtering

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Raja Sarath Kumar Boddu, Malla Reddy University, India.

(2) H S Prasantha, Atria University Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raja Sarath Kumar Boddu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H S Prasantha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Histopathological Effects of Industrial Effluents on Lung Tissues of Wistar Rats

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Heena Singh, Era’s Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Kshitij Bhikhubhai Dhameliya, RK University, India.

(3) Suvarna Ingale, SCES’ s Indira College of Pharmacy Pune, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heena Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshitij Bhikhubhai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suvarna Ingale, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Applications of Nanotechnology in Agriculture: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Midde Sai Kumar, Mallareddy University, India.

(2) Garima Pathak, B.D.College, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Midde Sai Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: On the Efficiency of Generalized Version Exponential Ratio Cum to Dual-Ratio Cum Type Estimator Via Robust Measure

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurdistan Ibrahim Mawlood, University of Salahaddin-Erbil, Iraq.

(2) Tersoo Uba, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurdistan Ibrahim Mawlood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tersoo Uba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Vine Length, Fruit Lycopene and Carotene Contents as Influenced by Fertilizer, Salinity and Bicarbonate Treatments in Snake Tomato (Tricosanthes cucumerina L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Shaimaa N.Mizil, Al-Mustansiriyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaimaa N.Mizil, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of C-Arm Guided and Open Intramedullary Pin Fixation for Long Bone Fractures in Dogs

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Kamalakar, NTR College Of Veterinary Science, India.

(2) Surbhi Kuldeep Tyagi, COVAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Kamalakar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surbhi Kuldeep Tyagi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Grain-borne Fungi on Farmer Saved Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sawan Kumar, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Malik Ahsaf Aziz, SKUAST-K, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sawan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malik Ahsaf Aziz, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Antioxidant and Anti-ulcerogenic Effect of Chloroform and Methanol Partitioned Leave Extracts of Harungana madagascariensis on Wistar Albino Rats: A Comparative Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Associate Professor, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Shankar, Adichunchanagiri University, India.

(2) Radha Palaniswamy, Dr. NGP Arts and Science College, India.

(3) Zubair Rehman Nengroo, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radha Palaniswamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zubair Rehman Nengroo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA