Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Oberoi, IIM-Bangalore, India.

(2) Ibrahim Dabo, Taraba State College of Health Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Oberoi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibrahim Dabo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Kalaiselvi, Navarasam Arts and Science College for Women, India.

(2) Dada Kolawole Segun, I.T.M.O University, Russia Federation.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Kalaiselvi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dada Kolawole Segun, Russia Federation) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Salem Nasralla Saleh, Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Ivanuta Marius, Umf Grigore T. Popa Iasi, Dr. C.I.Parhon Clinical Hospital, Romania.

(2) Swati Deshpande, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research(DU), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ivanuta Marius, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swati Deshpande, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Fuad Hasan, University of Trunojoyo, Indonesia.

(2) M. Kavaskar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fuad Hasan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Kavaskar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Joshi, IPS Academy (ISR) Indore, India.

(2) Ahmed Umer Sohaib, Superior University, Pakistan.

(3) N. Yogananth, Mohamed Sathak College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Umer Sohaib, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. Yogananth, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Hari Sharan Adhikari, Amrit Campus (Tribhuvan University), Nepal.

(2) G. Darshan Balaji, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hari Sharan Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Darshan Balaji, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, SOA-DU, India.

(2) Ashraf Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Desert Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashraf Ahmed Mohamed Habib, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Uma Gupta, Era’s University, India.

(2) Farzeen Tanwir, Bahria University Health Sciences Campus Karachi, Pakistan.

(3) Emmanouil M. Xydias, Greece.

(4) Abdus Sami, Qurtuba University of Sc. & Information Technology D.I.Khan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uma Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farzeen Tanwir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Emmanouil M. Xydias, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Abdus Sami, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, College of Science Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, USA.

(2) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Zayyanu Tukur, Abdu Gusau Polytechnic T, Nigeria.

(2) Dommaraju R Arunakumari, Seven Hills College of Pharmacy (Autonomous), India.

(3) Varsha Rawat, MATS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zayyanu Tukur, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dommaraju R Arunakumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Varsha Rawat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed A. Hassan, Associate Professor, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaswant Ray, India.

(2) Kafando Windlassida Abdoul Cader, Institute for the Environment and Agricultural Research, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaswant Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kafando Windlassida Abdoul Cader, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA