Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Applications of Micronutrients on the Yield Characteristics of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

(2) Yunus Arifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(3) Sadashiv V Nadukeri, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yunus Arifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sadashiv V Nadukeri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimating Nutritional Composition from Food Volume Via Deep Learning-Based Depth and Segmentation Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Scope Global Skills University, India.

(2) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeta Baban Bankhele, SPPU, India.

(2) Himanshu B. Patel, D. N. Patel College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeta Baban Bankhele, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himanshu B. Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Micronutrients Foliar Application on the Growth Traits of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Agnivesh Yadav, United University, India.

(2) N.Senthilkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute,Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agnivesh Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Sampling: Bridging Farmer’s Knowledge, Perception and Adoption for Sustainable Agriculture in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Somdutt Tripathi, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Raghvendra Kumar Kushwaha, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Angel Rafael Valera Valera, Romulo Gallegos University (UNERG), Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somdutt Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghvendra Kumar Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Angel Rafael Valera Valera, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Hybridized Machine Learning Based Crisis Period Prediction System for Epileptic Patient Using Crisp-DM and SVM

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland

Reviewers:

(1) S.Sharon Priya, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) M. Bhanu Sridhar, Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering for Women, India.

(3) Mohammad Ziaullah, SECAB Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Sharon Priya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Bhanu Sridhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Ziaullah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Mutingia calabura Leaves Extract on the Haematological Properties, Serum Biochemistry, and Intestinal Morphology in Ross Broiler Chickens

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Melaku Mulugeta Dagne, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

(2) Voemesse Kokou, Togolese Institute of Agronomic Research, Togo.

(3) Enoghase Raymond Joseph, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(4) Timothy Kuka, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melaku Mulugeta Dagne, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Voemesse Kokou, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Enoghase Raymond Joseph, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Timothy Kuka, Nigeria) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Terminal Diseases

Editor(s):

(1)Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rex P. Flejoles, Iloilo Science and Technology University, Philippines.

(2) Sudhanshu Sekhar Tripathy, C.V Raman Global University Bhubaneswar, India.

(3) Bodduru Keerthana, Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rex P. Flejoles, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhanshu Sekhar Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bodduru Keerthana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yemeni Folk Music: Women’s Experiences of Nostalgia and Longing in Songs

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Atila YILDIRIM, Necmettin Erbakan University Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Education, Turkey.

(2) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Amar Debnath, ICFAI University, India.

(2) Cyprian Nanji, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(3) Otniel Aurelius Nole, Satya Wacana Christian University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amar Debnath,  India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cyprian Nanji, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Otniel Aurelius Nole, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Amino Acids and Anti-nutrients Content of Ogi from Malted Millet, Soybeans and Fig Leaves Composite Flour

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhash Prasad, College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Nada Nikolić, University of Nis, Republic of Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhash Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nada Nikolić, Republic of Serbia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mean Performance, Genetic Variability and Correlation Analysis of Parthenocarpic Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under Protected Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivani Sharma, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivani Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA