Peer Review History: The Influence of Work Life Balance on Employee Performance with the Mediation of Employee Engagement: A Study at Pt. Hydro Water Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, UP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Md Sumon Gazi, United States of America (USA).

(2) D. Shobana, St. Joseph University, India.

(3) M. K. Ganeshan, AMET University, India.

(4) Aajaz Ahamd Hajam, Samarkand Branch of Tashkent State University of Economics, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md Sumon Gazi, United States of America (USA)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Shobana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. K. Ganeshan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Aajaz Ahamd Hajam, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Growth Enhancement of G4 Transgenic Mutiara Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Broodstock Candidate Using Mixed Feed

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Resit Taysi, Turkiye.

(2) Indulata Tekam, College of Fisheries Science, Dholi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, India.

(3) Ali Reza Radkhah, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Resit Taysi, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indulata Tekam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Reza Radkhah, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Implementation of Stunting Prevention and Management Policy in Gorontalo Regency, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Swati Vyas, IIS deemed to be a University, India.

(2) Alhadj Markhous Nazal, University of Sarh, Chad.

(3) Ojamalia Priscilla Godwins, University of Massachusetts, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swati Vyas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alhadj Markhous Nazal, Chad) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ojamalia Priscilla Godwins, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Psycho-social Support and Professional Conduct of Secondary School Teachers in Western Region, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ade Rahmat, IKIP PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia.

(2) Veena Suresh, National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ade Rahmat, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veena Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Experiences of Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) Teachers in the Integration of Peace Education in the Senior High School Curriculum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijesh P.V, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, India.

(2) Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon, Philippines.

(3) Cresencio Cabuga Jr, Del Pilar National High School, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.74/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vijesh P.V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cresencio Cabuga Jr, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the Epidemiological Impact of a Public Health Policy against Meningococcal Meningitis in Children in Maranhão, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Anahita Ataran, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.

(2) Geetanjali Sethy, CB Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anahita Ataran, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geetanjali Sethy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Fish Waste Compost as a Fertiliser for Agricultural Use: A Study in Mizoram, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajmal Siddique S, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Behnaz Atashpaz, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajmal Siddique S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Behnaz Atashpaz, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: India’s Transition to Clean Energy: A Review of Current Contributions from Renewable Energy Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Darlington Ekechukwu, United Kingdom.

(2) Chijioke Agupugo, Appalachian State University, United States.

(3) Moyeed Abrar, Khaja Bandanawaz University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Darlington Ekechukwu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Agupugo, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Moyeed Abrar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quantitative Analysis of Total Free Amino Acids and Their Pharmacological Implications in Wild Solanaceae Species from Menal Forest, Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Ngigi Mburu, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Fitsum Etefa AHMED, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopian Institute of Textile and Fashion Technology [BDU-EiTEX], Ethiopia.

(3) Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stephen Ngigi Mburu, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fitsum Etefa AHMED, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Library and Information Science (LIS) Education and Library Practice in India: Bridging the Gap or Deepening the Divide?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilhani Munasinghe, PGIM, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(2) Ida Fajar Priyanto, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

(3) N K Pachauri, Kendriya Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilhani Munasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ida Fajar Priyanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N K Pachauri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA