Peer Review History: Assessing the Living Conditions of Mahouths and Their Awareness Towards Welfare Program: A Socioeconomic Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação And Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Udit Maheshwari, India.

(2) Darade Rustum Hanumant, Samarth College of Engineering and Management, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udit Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darade Rustum Hanumant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Characterization of HSP60 Gene in Poonchi Chicken

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhanya Nath, India.

(2) Atindra Karar, British Society for Gene & Cell Therapy, India.

(3) Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhanya Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atindra Karar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contribution of Endoscopy to the Diagnosis of Anorectal Pathology in N’Djamena: An Analysis of Explorations in 842 Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arturs Niedritis, Latvia.

(2) Ana Margarida Duarte Silva Vieira, University of Algarve, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arturs Niedritis, Latvia) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ana Margarida Duarte Silva Vieira, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Production Parameters and Partial Purification of a Klebsiella pneumoniae Lipase Isolated from Freshly Produced Palm Oil

Editor(s):

(1) Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohsin Ahemad Mustak Ahemad Sheikh, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohsin Ahemad Mustak Ahemad Sheikh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Prevalence, Diagnosis and Management of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) in Saudi Arabia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, University of Ngaoundere-Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Karthik raman, India.

(2) Manjari Kishore, GS Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Karthik raman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manjari Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Organic Fish Farming and Its Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Janardan Pathak, B.Borooah College, India.

(2) Suruliyandi Vijayan, Abu Dhabi Public Health Centre, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Janardan Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Notable Impact of Rituximab in Managing Follicular Lymphoma: A Case Report and Review of Management Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) B L T Balasuriya, Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, Sri Lanka.

(2) Ayşe Şiva Acar, Giresun University, Turkey.

(3) Dario Siniscalco, University of Campania, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B L T Balasuriya, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayşe Şiva Acar, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dario Siniscalco, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design and Development of a Greenhouse Solar Energy-Based Corn Dryer: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Asst. Prof. Natt Makul, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Nimay Ch. Giri, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Ebangu Orari Benedict, Gulu University, Uganda.

(3) Mallikarjun G Huddmani, VTU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nimay Ch. Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ebangu Orari Benedict, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mallikarjun G Huddmani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: “Benign but Troubling Fat ball” behind the Scenes of a Rare Tumour: A Case Report of Intracardiac Lipoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Amjad Mahmood, AFIC, Pakistan.

(2) Karan Puri, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amjad Mahmood, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karan Puri, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Kasni (Cichorium intybus Linn.): A Scientific Recap

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Naseem A. Qureshi, Al-Falah University, India.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjay Sharma, Amity University, India.

(2) Talip Sahin, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

(3) Kahkashan Parvin, Era University, India.

(4) Sanjeet Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talip Sahin, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kahkashan Parvin, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sanjeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA