Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Ecological Health Status of Creek Road River Using the Condition Factor and Health Assessment Index of Tympanotanus fuscatus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ong Meng Chuan, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia.

(2) Prince C Edike, Strategic Integrated Solutions Industrial Design Services SISIDS Saint Louis University Baguio City, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cresencio c. Cabuga JR, Caraga State University Cabadbaran Campus, Philippines.

(2) S.Uthirasamy, Government Arts College(A) Salem-7, India.

(3) Saubhagya Silwal, Salem College, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ong Meng Chuan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince C Edike, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice and Healthcare (2010–2025): A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasurjya Saikia, Himalayan University, India.

(2) Jijo Joseph, David Tvildiani Medical University, India.

(3) Muchukota Sushma, Aditya Bangalore Institute of Pharmacy Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasurjya Saikia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jijo Joseph, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muchukota Sushma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SCAPS-1D Numerical Simulation of Homojunction and Heterojunction ZnO/Si Solar Cells

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jie Shu, Ningbo University, People’s Republic of China

Reviewers:

(1) Radouane En-nadir, Sherbrooke University, Canada.

(2) Rashmi Amit Deshpande, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asha Chauhan, K.K. University Biharsharif Nalanda, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radouane En-nadir,  Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Amit Deshpande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Statistical Methods for Detecting Rater Bias in Ordinal Categorical Data

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Puja Singh, Bundelkhnad Medical College, India.

(2) Chandra Shikhi Kodete, Eastern Illinois University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olamide Durodola, Auburn University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puja Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandra Shikhi Kodete, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: 3ConFA: A Robust Feature Aggregation Framework for High-dimensional Data Optimization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Srinivas Kalisetty, USA.

(2) Abhinav Balasubramanian, United States of America.

(3) Mahboobeh Fattahi, Khorasan University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srinivas Kalisetty, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhinav Balasubramanian, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahboobeh Fattahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biological Constraints in Huckleberry, Potato and Tomato Production in the Western Region of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Egerton University, Kenya.

(2) P. Sreelatha, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oyebamiji Isaac Tunde, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Rita Kapil Narvariya, Jawahar Lal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Atsu Agbolosoo, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Sreelatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer : A Case Series of 20 Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Tatiana Garmanova, Moscow State University, Russia.

(2) Sujan Narayan Agrawal, Government District Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tatiana Garmanova, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sujan Narayan Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Study and Evaluation of the Nutritional Potential of Glyphaea brevis leaves from the flora of Togo

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A.V. Raghu, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Patrick Martin, Artois University, France.

(2) Oluwatobi Sarah Otun, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

(3) Dewa Ayu Made Adnyaswari, Udayana University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Sami Mohamed Mansour g, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Dileepu Kumar Banisetti, Maharajah’s College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Olena Grechana, Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmacy University, Ukraine.

(4) Sartaz Begum, St John’s University Of Tanzania, Tanzania.

(5) Tibebu Hailesillassie Mamuye, Animal Health Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Patrick Martin, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwatobi Sarah Otun, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dewa Ayu Made Adnyaswari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post-Translational Modifications as Molecular Mediators in the Pathogenesis and Complications of Diabetes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiran Kumar Hb, Nrupathunga University, India.

(2) Mohammad Taher Hojjati, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiran Kumar Hb, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Taher Hojjati, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Inorganic Fertilizers, Organic Manures, and their Integration on Soil Carbon Sequestration in a Long-term Rice-rice Cropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa,Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohit Kashyap, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(2) Mohit Meena, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohit Kashyap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohit Meena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA