Peer Review History: Multivariate Analyses of Climate-Resilient Traits for in situ Conservation of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Diversity in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Anil Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Carolina Lyra De Albuquerque, Federal University of Paraíba, Brazil.

(2) Jayita Baruah, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(3) K Kandiannan, ICAR-IISR Kozhikode, India.

(4) Karem saad, University of Sfax, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Anil Shahane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Murugaragavan Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Audio-Video Resources in Postgraduate Distance Education: Evaluating Student Engagement, Learning Outcomes and Perceptions at The Open University of Sri Lanka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Louie P. Gula, Visayas State University, Philippines.

(2) Monirul Islam, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (CVASU), Bangladesh.

(3) Mrigendra Kumar, Remesh Jha Mahila College Saharsa, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Trisha Dowerah Baruah, Krishna Kanta Handiqui State Open University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Louie P. Gula, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monirul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mrigendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Beyond the Blueprint: A Multiple Case Study on Bridging the Gap between the Intended and Lived Realities of Physical Education under the MATATAG Curriculum

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Gururaja C S, Mount Carmel College, India.

(2) Muhammad Rafiq-Uz-Zaman, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jesselyn c. mortejo, Bataan Peninsula State University, Philippines.

(2) Vwamse Domshak Haruna, Ecclesian Theological University Benin, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gururaja C S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Rafiq-Uz-Zaman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Public Health Care Expenditure in India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramachandran R, Sona College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Saba Shaukat, Gomal University of D.I. Khan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bandita Deka, Suren Das College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramachandran R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saba Shaukat, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SWOT Analysis of Inland Primary Fisheries Cooperative Societies in Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Atul Kumar Jain, Ornamental Fisheries Training and Research Institute, India.

(2) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Panchakarla Sedyaaw, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atul Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dilip Kumar Darjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strengthening Domestic Revenue Mobilisation Beyond Aid: The Willingness of Informal Sector to Pay Taxes in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Zakariyau Gurama, Gombe State University Gombe, Nigeria.

(3) Muhammad A. Seddeek, Cairo University, Egypt.

(4) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli Korca, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joseph, Institute of Migration, Spain.

(2) Claudiu Pirnau, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Samwel Alananga, Ardhi University, Tanzania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Sundar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zakariyau Gurama, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad A. Seddeek, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Irena Nikaj, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Overview of Biomaterials-Derived Chitosan for Regenerative Medicine

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Adarsh Kumar Pathak, SVU, India.

(2) Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Middle Technical University, (MTU), Iraq.

(3) Mounika V, The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR University of Health Sciences, India.

(4) Onwuazor, Ogechukwu Philomena, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra Munjaba Hanwate, Valmik Naik College Of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adarsh Kumar Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mounika V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Onwuazor, Ogechukwu Philomena, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Kinetic Modeling and Bio-energy Potential of Anaerobic Co-digestion: Cow Dung with Invasive Water Hyacinth Versus Agro-industrial Cassava Peels

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal S. Gaballa, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhamad Soffi Manda, Polytechnic Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology- Iraq, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Donatus Begianpuye ADIE, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Richard Ciotola, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhamad Soffi Manda, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Environmental Accounting Disclosures and Profitability in Nigerian Listed Oil and Gas Companies: A Dynamic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Olexandr Yemelyanov, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Fikiru Habtamu Abebe, Ambo Univesity, Ethiopia.

(2) Tejal J Mahajan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hulgizie Tilahun Teferie, Ethiopia.

(2) Rosdiana, Nuku University, Indonesia.

(3) Mukhtaruddin, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fikiru Habtamu Abebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejal J Mahajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preservation of Nutrients Using Non-Thermal Processing Methods: A Scoping Review of Recent Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratibha D. Sharma, DRPCAU, India.

(2) Hassan Sabbaghi, University of Torbat-e Jam, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gbaa Stephen Terpase, University of Rhode Island United States, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pratibha D. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassan Sabbaghi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA