Peer Review History: Soil and Water Conservation Measures for Promoting Climate-Resilient Dryland Horticulture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Raja Gopal V, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ritwik Sahoo, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shruti Gupta, University of Jammu, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raja Gopal V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ritwik Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the Economic Impact of Traffic Congestion on Highways with a High-volume Capacity (VC) Ratio in the Special Region of Yogyakarta

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Kumar Yadav, Parul University, India.

(2) Lotfi Ezzeddini, Tunisia.

(3) Juang Akbardin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Derradji KADRI, University of Mohamed Boudiaf – Msila, Algeria.

(2) Divya J, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, OMR, India.

(3) Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas, Civil Aviation Polytechnic of Surabaya, Indonesia.

(4) Zahraa A. Jaaz, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lotfi Ezzeddini, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Juang Akbardin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Holding Time on Residual Leucocyte Counts and Protein Concentration in Unfiltered Fresh Frozen Plasma

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy A, Sliem, Suez Canal University, Egypt And Qassim university and EL-Jouf university , Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Mmaun Sikder, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

(2) Zarina Farheen, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, India.

(3) Ashish Kushwaha, JBIT College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Henry Chizoba Nwankwo, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(2) Saqib Kakar, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Mmaun Sikder, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zarina Farheen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashish Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dissipation of Pyrithiobac-Sodium at Different Soil Moisture regimes in cotton growing soils of Telangana State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey (Edward), National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Daniel O. Udorah, Federal Polytechnic Oko, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel O. Udorah, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nanotechnology between Immunity and Cancer Therapy: Novel Applications and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Bracamonte, National University of Cordoba (UNC), Argentine.

(2) Entidhar Jasim Khamees, College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raman Kumari, Rajendra Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(2) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, silchar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guillermo Bracamonte, Argentine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Entidhar Jasim Khamees, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Generative AI for 3D Film and Animation Modelling: Pathways, Workflows, and Emerging Standards

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Wu Jiabao, Changzhou College of Information Technology, China.

(2) Ayush G Kottary, St Aloysius (Deemed to be University), India.

(3) Nassim Bout, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sureshkumar Somanathan, Strayer University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wu Jiabao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayush G Kottary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nassim Bout, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morpho-Physiological Performance of Glycine max (L.) Merrill an Oil Seed Crop Genotypes under Drought Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. C. S. Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Avdesh Bhardawaj, Juno Terra Technology Private Limited Delhi, India.

(2) Kassa Abera Tareke, Kombolcha Institute of Technology,Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Singh, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avdesh Bhardawaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kassa Abera Tareke, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mathematical Satisfaction and Attitude towards Mathematics as Predictors of Student Engagement among Senior High School Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

(2) Obinna Nzechie, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(3) Byungdo Park, Chungbuk National University, South Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zainab Bibi, International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Obinna Nzechie, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Byungdo Park, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Landscape Dynamics and Impact of Anti-Salt Micro-Dams on Rice Cultivation in the Djiguinoum Sub-Watershed, South Senegal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Halim Khan, Atarra Post Graduate College Atarra, India.

(2) Laishram Sunil Singh, Waikhom Mani Girls` College, India.

(3) Hamid Ganjaeian, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ardalan Afrasiabian, Tu Graz, Iran.

(2) Fahimeh Mokhtari, Shahrekord University, Iran.

(3) Richard Fletcher, Qatar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Halim Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laishram Sunil Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hamid Ganjaeian, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community-Engaged Learning and the UN SDGs: Insights from Two Indonesian Higher Education Institutions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Biswajyoti Sarmah, Tyagbir Hem Baruah College, Gauhati University, India.

(2) Olga Samsonova, Lake County Schools, USA.

(3) Rubeena, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aliyu Rabiu Karmanje, Alqalam University Katsina, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Biswajyoti Sarmah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olga Samsonova, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rubeena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA