Peer Review History: Design of Projection Optical System for Dynamic Star Simulator

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) R. B. Magadum, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Chintan Morsiya, L. J. Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emin Taner Elmas, Igdir University, Turkey.

(2) Vijayvignesh N S, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. B. Magadum, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chintan Morsiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bond Debt and Poverty in the WAEMU Area

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Njong Mom Aloysius, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(2) Nimra Ishfaq, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

(3) Matthew Uduak Patrick, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Njong Mom Aloysius, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nimra Ishfaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Matthew Uduak Patrick, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Weed Management Practices on Dry Matter Production and Nutrient Uptake by Castor (Ricinus communis L.) and Associated Weeds

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Wafaa Haggag, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruchika Choudhary,Agronomy, MPUAT, India.

(2) Zakaria Alnaser, University of Damascus, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar, Droan College of Education & Technology, Kumaun University, India.

(2) Dhia GHARABI, Ibn Khaldoun University, Algeria.

(3) Himanshu Verma, College of Agriculture & Environmental Technology, Surajmal University, India.

(4) Lui Wing Kin, Gordon University, Hong Kong.

(5) Mohammed Shams Mekky, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruchika Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zakaria Alnaser, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Action of the Permutation Group (G, X) on the Power Set Ƥ(X)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shah Fahed, University of Jhang, Pakistan.

(2) Muntaha Khudhair Abbas, Al – Mustafa Unversity, Iraq.

(3) M.Felix Nes Mabel, St. Xavier’s Catholic College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shah Fahed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muntaha Khudhair Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.Felix Nes Mabel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Modulation with Amino Acids, Probiotics and Prebiotics and its impact on Growth Performance and Feed Conversion Ratio in Aseel Chickens under Tropical Conditions of Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Khalfa Ali, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwafemi Abel Agbetuyi, Federal University Oye Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Ndifreke John Ekanem, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(3) Charles Henry Mpemba, Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sudik Samuel David, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Afrah Abdulwaheed Habeeb, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Sudik Samuel David, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluwafemi Abel Agbetuyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ndifreke John Ekanem, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Charles Henry Mpemba. Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Opportunities, Investments and Barriers in Climate-Smart Livestock Farming in Africa: A Focus on East Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University Of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Acacio Cardoso Amaral, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e, Timor-Leste.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chukwubuzor Miracle Chinemerem, Royal Institute of Tropics, Netherlands.

(2) Israa A. A. Hamdan, AL-Mutnanna university, Iraq.

(3) Nour abdulehsan dhannoon, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Acacio Cardoso Amaral, Timor-Leste) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Taurine-Induced Chromosomal Abnormalities in Allium cepa using a Plant Bioassay

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marie-Christine Raymond Shakib, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewer :

(1) M. Mariraj, Sri Kaliswari College, India.

(2) Ida Farikha Azizah, National Research and Innovation, Indonesia.

(3) M S kusumadevi, BMCRI, India.

(4) Pritha Ghosh, St. Pious X Degree and PG College , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhirendra Kumar Singh, KIIT Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Pranay Namdeo Sadawarti, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) C. Shobana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Mariraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ida Farikha Azizah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M S kusumadevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pritha Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Consumer Purchasing Attitude toward Domestic Sweet Oranges in Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Béguinot, University of Burgundy, France.

(2) Dr.  Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Singh, Institute of Agri Business Management, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) P. Mohanraj, Nandha Arts and Science College (AUTONOMOUS), India.

(3) Kshitij Trivedi, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kelefilwe Motlogelwa, North-West University, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Mohanraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kshitij Trivedi, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Growth of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education Zing, Nigeria.

(2) Ghassen Abid, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC), Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chairuddin, STMIK IM, Indonesia.

(2) Minakshee Sawankar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 88.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: PHYSIO-CHEMICAL AND SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF COOKIES PRODUCED FROM COMPOSITE FLOUR BLENDS OF MODIFIED ‘GBACHE’ AND SOYBEAN

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ferial Mohamed Abu- Salem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Okeogracechisom, Fede University of Agricultureabeokuta, Nigeria.

(2) Bhagya  D, St. Joseph’s College for Women Alappuzha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Okeogracechisom, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhagya  D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA