Peer Review History: The role of Machine Learning (ML) in predicting consumer behaviour: innovation or violation?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Maharshi Rahevar, Shree Swaminarayan Arts and Commerce College, HNGU, India.

(2) Shivam Tripathi, Lakulish Yoga University, India.

(3) Bindoo Malviya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Sharma, Jagan Institute of Management Studies(Affiliated to IP university), India.

(2) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(3) Ravi Rachapudi, Dr.K.V.Subba Reddy school of Business Management, JNTUA, India.

(4) Surjadeep Dutta, Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College, India.

(5) Vibhuti Shivam Dube, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maharshi Rahevar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivam Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bindoo Malviya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Non-tree Carbon Pools and Tree Trait Effects in Polavaram Range, Andhra Pradesh” or “Litter, Herbaceous and Soil Carbon in Polavaram Range (Andhra Pradesh, India): Influence of Tree Height, DBH and Density

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratan Lal Solanki, KVK, India.

(2) Kyawt Yin Min Thein, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Immy Suci Rohyani, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

(2) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

(3) Peter Isaiah Akpan, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(4) Ratan Lal Solank, KVK, Chittorgarh, MPUAT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratan Lal Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kyawt Yin Min Thein, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of organic formulations and growth regulators on seed quality of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Murtadha Abdladhem Abdlnabi Alfaris, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) KOUADIO Zile Alex, Cote d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murtadha Abdladhem Abdlnabi Alfaris, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KOUADIO Zile Alex, Cote d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conducting comparisons to analyze financial reality under the umbrella of the Kruskal-Wallis test: Evidence from the Saudi financial market

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Kompalli Sasi Kumar, Gitam School of Business, India.

(3) Rashesh Vaidya, Nepal Open University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kavitha Muthukumaran, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, India.

(2) Margaret Lucy M. Kibera, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kompalli Sasi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rashesh Vaidya, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparatative Evaluation of Sapindus mukorossi Extract, 0.2% Chitosan and 17% EDTA on Root Canal Dentine Erosion – An in vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, University of Michigan, USA.

(2) Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepal.

(3) Rasiga G, SRM Dental College, India.

(4) Reema Joshi, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rasiga G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Reema Joshi, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Case Series of Breast Tissue Marking in Local Setting Using Surgical Clips as an Alternative for Breast Cancer Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Natalia Camejo, Hospital De Clinicas, Uruguay.

(2) Shahenul Islam, Dhaka International University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Natalia Camejo, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahenul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mathematical Model Equations of Biochemical Reaction in Tomato Plants Defense Mechanism

Editor(s): 

(1) Prof. Qing-Wen Wang, Shanghai University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadir Ali Bhangar, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Ravish Gupta, Dr. C.V. Raman University, India.

(3) Kiran Kotyal, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jane Wandia Githui, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadir Ali Bhangar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravish Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kiran Kotyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional, Culinary, and Sensory Characteristics of Noodles Made from Composite Flours of Wheat (Triticum aestivum), African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa), and Jackfruit Seed (Artocarpus heterophyllus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Amita Beniwal, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Majid Majeed, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Osman Abdel Rhman Shalaby, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amita Beniwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Majid Majeed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Structural and Institutional Drivers of Investor–Smallholder Land Conflicts in Kilombero, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics,  China.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahid Hussain Mirani, Pakistan.

(2) Temesgen Kebede, Ethiopia.

(3) Sanjeet Singh, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Simhachalam, National Institute Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahid Hussain Mirani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Temesgen Kebede, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjeet Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Food Security Implications of Traditional Maize Storage Methods: A Case Study of Market Traders in the Volta Region, Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Florin SALA, Romania.

(2) Miankshi Kandari, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

(2) Lekshmi R S, St Joseph College of Engineering, India.

(3) Mohammed Jiya Mamman, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florin SALA, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miankshi Kandari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA