Peer Review History: Deep Learning Framework for Accurate Detection of Liver Steatosis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Dilip Kumar, NGM College, India.

(2) Aswathy Mohan, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(3) Abhijit Patil, GITAM University (Deemed To be University), India.

(4) Teja Krishna Kota, New England College, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D.Satheesh Kumar, Hindusthan College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) E. Manjula, DG Viashnav College, India.

(3) E.Sujatha, Saveetha Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(4) Teja Krishna Kota, New England College, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Dilip Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aswathy Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abhijit Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Teja Krishna Kota, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Strategies for the Management of Linseed Bud Fly (Dasyneura lini Barnes) on Linseed Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, Soadu, INDIA.

(2) Kiran Thakur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiran Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preparation and Dietary Evaluation of Fortified Yoghurt with Snail Shells

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Bharanidharan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

(2) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Binod Kumar Bharti, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology (Bihar Animal Sciences University), India.

(2) Guido Laércio Bragança Castagnino, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(3) Millatul Ulya, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Bharanidharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the physico-chemical and microbiological quality of the traditional fromage “Tchoukou” cheese sold in Niamey

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Devangee P. Shukla, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Eman Nafei, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devangee P. Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman Nafei, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field evaluation of different soybean genotypes against stem fly Melanagromyza sojae (Zehntner)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagrati Upadhyay, Mangalayatan University Jabalpur, India.

(2) Anita Narang, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, India.

(3) Dharna Tembhare Bisen, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyadharshini Velayutham, SRS Institute of Agriculture & Technology, Vedasandur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagrati Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anita Narang, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dharna Tembhare Bisen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Saponins, Tannins and Alkaloids Fractions of Bridelia micrantha: Effects on the Prefrontal Cortex of Ketamine-Induced Cognitive Dysfunction in Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, MIT Vishwaprayag University, India.

(2) Alina Maria Sisu, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Kulawe Darmasu, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hawaa H. Naji, Al-Qassim Green university, Iraq.

(2) Neelima Sunder, Maharajah’s Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Tejas Ganatra, RK University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alina Maria Sisu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kulawe Darmasu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability, Heritability and Expected Genetic Advance in Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadir Ali Bhangar, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Sowndarya Karapareddy, Alabama A&M University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gaddam Tarun, Guru Kashi University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadir Ali Bhangar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sowndarya Karapareddy, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Analysis of Toxoplasmosis Research in Iraq: Advancements in Regional Trends and Clinical Implications (1989–2024)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine, United States.

Reviewers:

(1) Rachel Joy S. Ellorin, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Musafer H. Al-Ardi, Iraq.

(3) Mochabo Kennedy Miyoro, Egerton University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sana Ullah, University of Balochistan Quetta. (UOB), Pakistan.

(2) Sheikh Atiq-ur-Rehman, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rachel Joy S. Ellorin, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Musafer H. Al-Ardi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mochabo Kennedy Miyoro, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Nutritional Profile and in-Vivo Studies of Some Local Snacks Produced from Zuru Community, Kebbi State

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers: 

(1) Anindita Deb Pal, J.D. Birla Institute, India.

(2) Prasad Shridharrao Gangakhedkar, College of Food Technology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anindita Deb Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasad Shridharrao Gangakhedkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation, Preparation and Sensory Evaluation of Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Fasting Snack

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(2) Ram Narayan Prajapati, Bundelkhand University, India.

(3) Zugravu Constanta Laura, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pallavi Nilesh Shindikar, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

(2) Funke Adedeji Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

(3) Seun Elizabeth Kuyooro, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.

(4) Yuniar Khasanah, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. M. Koli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ram Narayan Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zugravu Constanta Laura, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA