Peer Review History: Next-Gen Gene Editing and Programmable Chromosome Engineering for Potential Cancer Gene Mutation Therapeutics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Singh Rajput, Madhyancal Professional University, INDIA.

(2) Welma Emidio Da Silva, Universidade Federal De Pernambuco RECIFE, Brasil.

(3) Filipe Nogueira Franco, University Federal of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edenilson Brandl, Brazil.

(2) Ian James Martins, Edith Cowan University, Australia.

(3) Murtadha Kareem Najim, College of Health and Medical Technology Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(4) Samuel Adinoyi Adavba, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dharmendra Singh Rajput, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Welma Emidio Da Silva, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Filipe Nogueira Franco, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithms in Dental CBCT: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasemin Derya Fidancıoğlu, Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry, Turkey.

(2) Sravya vemareddy, NTR university( Narayana dental college), INDIA.

(3) Huma Sarwar, Dr Ishrat ul Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences (DIKIOHSDUHS), Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasemin Derya Fidancıoğlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sravya vemareddy, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Huma Sarwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Anthropogenic pollution and its impact on silkworm health and silk production

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav N. Kasar, Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana (Nashik), India.

(2) Dalia Mamdouh Mabrouk, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cahyadi Nugroho, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia.

(2) Dalia Mamdouh Mabrouk, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurav N. Kasar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dalia Mamdouh Mabrouk, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydrogeological Parameters Significantly Affecting the Productivity of Boreholes in the Bedrock Aquifer of the Bounkani Region, Northeastern Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandrakant P.  Dorlikar, Gondwana University, India.

(2) Collins Akhonya Siganga, Kenya.

(3) Nguyen Chi Thanh, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam.

(4) Erika BEILICCI, University of Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tuan Quang Tran, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandrakant P.  Dorlikar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Collins Akhonya Siganga, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nguyen Chi Thanh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Erika BEILICCI, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Safe and Effective Management of Tinea Cruris with Rhinacanthus nasutus Root Extract Gel (0.2% Rhinacanthin C): A Case Report on Clinical and Mycological Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurij Janež, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Reviewers: 

(1) M.Indhumathy, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) MayankKumar. G .Raval , India.

(3) Zeenath Ruhy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Durga Prasad TS, Sri Padmavathi School of Pharmacy (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Indhumathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MayankKumar. G .Raval, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zeenath Ruhy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic evaluation of Gladiolus (Gladiolus L.) genotypes for off season cultivation in sub temperate zone

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Najmus Sayadat Pitol, Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Rashmi R., ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Meenu Kumari, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Najmus Sayadat Pitol, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi R., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of NICRA Interventions on Psycho-Social Dimensions of Women Empowerment in Murshidabad, West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Buggavarapu VSS Subbarao, KCT Business School, India.

(2) Mona Prashar, Free Lance Academic Consultant, India.

(3) Parna Chakraborty, Adamas University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aneesya Panicker, Institute of Business Management, GLA University, India.

(2) Hegedus Cristina, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(3) Parna Chakraborty, Adamas University, India.

(4) Savita Punjabi, University of Mumbai, India.

(5) Setiasih Dra, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Buggavarapu VSS Subbarao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona Prashar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Parna Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Postoperative Takotsubo Syndrome Presenting with Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pranavi Kilaru, Mamata Academy of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Kumari Akanksha, Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maha Nadir, Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology, Pakistan.

(2) Nasrin Ghadakkar, Iran.

(3) varsha Vekaria-Hirani, University of Nairobi, Mp Shah hospital, kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pranavi Kilaru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumari Akanksha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Capital Structure – Firm Performance Nexus: A Systematic Review Amid the COVID-19 Crisis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Nini, Universitas Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.

(2) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al Madinah International University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adekola Gbolagade, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Angguliyah RIzqi Amaliyah, Raden Rahmat Islamic University Malang, Indonesia.

(3) Nidhi Mittal, GJUS&T, India.

(4) Ramakrishna Vuppuluri, India.

(5) Stanislas T. Médard D. C. Agossadou, University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Republic of Benin.

(6) Timothy Terver Ugoh, University of New Brunswick, Saint John.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nini, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Pollution and Its Associated Risks to Public Health in the Camaron-Sabalo Lagoon, Mazatlan, Mexico

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Noor Zulfiqar, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Stephen Awogbami, College of Health Sciences and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aarti Jangir, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Aziz Ollah Tajvar, Chabahar Maritime University, Iran.

(3) Shyam Singh, Meerut college (ccs university Meerut), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noor Zulfiqar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stephen Awogbami, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA