Peer Review History: Potential Anti-hyperglycemic Activity of the Polyherbal Combination of Carica papaya L., Persea americana Mill., and Theobroma cacao L. Leaves Extract: In vitro, Ex vivo, In vivo Studies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Suman Manandhar, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nepal.

(2) K Syed Zameer Ahmed, K. S. Rangasamy College of Technology, India.

(3) Nermien Zakaria Ahmed Teleb, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suman Manandhar, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K Syed Zameer Ahmed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nermien Zakaria Ahmed Teleb, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidative Potential of Telfairia occidentalis Aqueous Leaves Extract in Mitigating Cyclophosphamide-Induced Neurotoxicity in Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair & Director, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Government College University, Pakistan.

(2) Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan.

(3) Tafail Akbar Mughal, Women University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tafail Akbar Mughal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Computational Identification of YQG-Like Small-molecule Inhibitors Targeting TIM-3 for Cancer Immunotherapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Assistant Professor, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joy Elaine K. Diacos, College of Arts and Sciences, Laguna State Polytechnic University, Philippines.

(2) K. Rajaganapathy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Shouhartha Choudhury, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joy Elaine K. Diacos, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Rajaganapathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shouhartha Choudhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional, Microbiological Evaluation, and Stability of Cocoa and Cashew-based Ready-to-Use Foods to Combat Child Malnutrition in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rita Andini, National Agency of Research and Innovation (BRIN), Research Group Genetic Engineering, KST Soekarno, Indonesia.

(2) Prof. Ming-Chih Shih, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Hasnain, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Tripti Verma, Narendra Deva University of Agriculture &Technology, India.

(3) Priyanka Arya, Pantnagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Hasnain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tripti Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Arya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge on Child Protection among Children: A Study on Selected Schools in Munali Constituency of Lusaka, Zambia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Assistant Professor, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Quegas Mutale, Institute of Development Studies, National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe.

(2) Pinnawalage Harshani Avanthika Pinnawala, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Quegas Mutale, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pinnawalage Harshani Avanthika Pinnawala, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Decoding Investment Intentions: Uncovering How Risk Tolerance, Financial Literacy, and Subjective Norms Drive Students to Begin Stock Investing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Glorina C. Damong, College of Public Administration and Governance, Benguet State University, Philippines.

(2) S S Mageswari, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Glorina C. Damong, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S S Mageswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Report and Morphological Study of Paraplagusia bilineata (Bloch, 1787) in the Arabian Sea, Gujarat, Northwest Coast of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yassir Dakheel Kremsh Alasadiy, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

(2) Abhisek Saha, Tufanganj College, Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yassir Dakheel Kremsh Alasadiy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhisek Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Cucurbit Fruit Fly (Zeugodacus cucurbitae) Coquilette to Gel Formulations of Protein Bait

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Surender K. Sharma, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(2) Hamdi Rayene, University 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surender K. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamdi Rayene, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prediction Liver Diseases based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Associate Professor, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M S Madhu, India.

(2) Wan Aezwani Wan Abu Bakar, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.

(3) Muthuswamy Jayanthi, New Horizon College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M S Madhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wan Aezwani Wan Abu Bakar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muthuswamy Jayanthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurij Janez, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) R Arun Kumar, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, India.

(2) Gokulakrishnan.J, Thanthai Roever College of Physiotherapy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R Arun Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gokulakrishnan.J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA