Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Irem Kilinc, Izmir Katip Celebi Universitesi, Turkey.

(2) Javier Isaac Contreras Ramirez, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosi, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irem Kilinc, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javier Isaac Contreras Ramirez, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Christine Wulandari, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Khaled Hassan Mohammed Mohammed, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Tapon Kumar Roy, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khaled Hassan Mohammed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tapon Kumar Roy, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Soma Garani, WBUAFS, India.

(2) Umate Usman, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soma Garani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umate Usman, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Aino P. Coronacion, Batangan National High School, Philippines.

(2) Mohd. Fadzly Bin Wasriep, IPG Kampus Keningau, Malaysia.

(3) Hommane Boudine, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aino P. Coronacion, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd. Fadzly Bin Wasriep, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hommane Boudine, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

(2) Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Bucharest University, Netherlands.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Netherlands) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S., All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Harini Devi, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University, India.

(3) Sampoornam. W, Bhavani College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Harini Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sampoornam. W, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suranjit Roy, Assam University, India.

(2) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

(3) Vikash Gaur, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suranjit Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vikash Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujit Kumar, Allama Iqbal College, Patliputra University, India.

(2) Salisu Abubakar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

(2) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Wishah Mohammednour Ahmed Mohammednour, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

(2) Rajashri Kanad Gutte, India.

(3) A. Priyadharshini, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wishah Mohammednour Ahmed Mohammednour, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajashri Kanad Gutte, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Priyadharshini, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gajendra Agrawal, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, India.

(2) Hitesh Gurjar, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gajendra Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hitesh Gurjar, Tucson) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA