Peer Review History: Assessment of Psychological Well-being among Residents of Ilobu, Erin-Osun and Ifon-Osun in Osun State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shazia Tahira, Bahria University, Pakistan.

(2) Susanti Niman.,MKep.,Ns.,SpKepJ, Immanuel Institute of Health, Indonesia.

(3) Sneha Sharma, S. S. Jain Subodh P.G. College Jaipur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shazia Tahira, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Susanti Niman.,MKep.,Ns.,SpKepJ, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sneha Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Storage Study of Flavour Blended Mulberry Leaf Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Waqar, Walailak University, Thailand.

(2) M. Ashwin Niranjan, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Oluwamuyiwa OJE, Nigeria.

(2) Bhabani Shankar Panda, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Waqar, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Ashwin Niranjan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: EFFECT OF DIFFERENT EDIBLE DYES ON FLOWER QUALITY AND VASE LIFE OF TINTED TUBEROSE (Polianthes tuberosa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Mazar Ali, India.

(2) Manish Kumar, Career Point University Kota, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Mazar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perinatal Outcome of First Twin Versus Second Twin in a Tertiary Care Centre

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Ferdi Kinci, University of Health Sciences, İzmir City Hospital, Türkiye.

(2) Nitika Gupta, Autonomous State Medical College, India.

(3) Meena Konsam, Manipal College of Nursing, India.

(4) Pawan Kumar, Gsvm Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Ferdi KINCI, University of Health Sciences, Türkiye.

(2) Mohammed Ubaid Hussein, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(3) S. Bharanidharan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.47/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Ferdi Kinci, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitika Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meena Konsam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pawan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neuroprotective Effects of Piper methysticum against Phenytoin-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Nishant Verma, AKTU, India.

(2) Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, University of Lomé, Togo.

(3) Abdel Aleem Bello, University of Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mujahid Sher, Premier Institute of Health and Management Sciences Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Roja Rani Budha, D Y Patil deemed to be university school of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Samba Siva Raju Derangula, Sri Balaji Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, India.

(4) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(5) Viralbhai Ashvinbhai Prajapati, Shree Swaminarayan Sanskar Pharmacy College, GTU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nishant Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdel Aleem Bello, Syrian Arab Republic) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The History, Current Status and Political Suggestions of Soybean Cultivation in Korea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, India.

(2) Vinay Chamoli, JBIT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahila Christopher WAKAWA, National Centre for Technology Management (NACETEM), Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay Chamoli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-Economic and Technological Factors Influencing Water Table Changes in Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Puneeth Raja R, India.

(2) Geeta Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puneeth Raja R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining Preferred ICT Tools Use Among the Farmers in Kota, Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhadip Pal, India.

(2) Weijimlu Tayang, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhadip Pal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Weijimlu Tayang, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Changes in Major Rice Cultivars in Korea Since 2000: Past Achievements, Current Status and Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

(2) Dileepkumar Masuthi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hemant Sahu, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Saurabh Samdarshi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dileepkumar Masuthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management in Kewda in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Zahidur Rahman, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Gana Manjusha Kondepudi, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yehia Galal M. Galal, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

(2) Karishma Das, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(3) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Аnvarovich, Scientific research institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Zahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gana Manjusha Kondepudi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA