Peer Review History: Analyzing the Regional Economic Underpinnings of Foreign Direct Investment Sustainability in East Kalimantan Post-Ibu Kota Nusantara Relocation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Masika Benjamin Barasa, Kenya.

(2) Ziaul Islam, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(3) Valiev Oybek, Uzbekistan.

(4) Yilmaz Onur ARİ, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kalman Kalotay, Eotvos Lorand University, Hungary.

(2) Miki Runtev, “European University – Skopje”, Republic of North Macedonia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masika Benjamin Barasa, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ziaul Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Valiev Oybek, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Yilmaz Onur ARİ, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antidiabetic Properties of Medicago sativa (Alfalfa) Aqueous Leaf Extract on Alloxan-induced Diabetes in Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio Altieri, Sapienza University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepa.R, India.

(2) Annepaka Eliya Raju, Mamata Medical College, India.

(3) Alfred Wehdoe Sloh, Nigeria.

(4) Arit Okechukwu Nwogu, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepa.R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Annepaka Eliya Raju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alfred Wehdoe Sloh, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arit Okechukwu Nwogu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints and Strategies in Scaling up of Innovations in Agricultural Extension: Insights from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi Aremu,Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Ayaanee Bilal, Central University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

(2) Radwa M Ata, Cairo University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adewale Abidemi Aremu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayaanee Bilal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Medicinal Plants through in Silico Approaches in the Fight against COVID-19: Current Evidence and Future Prospect

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Midhila.K.J, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Jaini Patel, Sharda School of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Halavath Ramesh, ICAR-National Meat Research Institute, India.

(4) Vrushabh Sunil Patil, Dr J.J.Magdum Pharmacy College Jaysingpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.Anupama, India.

(2) Ramkishan Jatoth, JSS Academy Of Higher Education And Research-JSS College Of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.82/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Midhila.K.J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaini Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Halavath Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Vrushabh Sunil Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Selected Salt Tolerant Soybean Genotypes in Southern Saline Soils of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. L. Dotaniya, ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Heena Thakur, Eternal University, India.

(2) Renisson Neponuceno De Araujo Filho, Federal University of Rural Pernambuco, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heena Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renisson Neponuceno De Araujo Filho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Horticulture: Current Trends and Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Levent SON , The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) T Mylsami, Grd College of Science, India.

(2) Shilpa K C, PES Institute of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T Mylsami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa K C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of Different Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) Varieties to Various Fertilizer Rates under Late Sowing Irrigated Conditions in the Jammu Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Srijan Samanta, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Nazar Gul, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imran Ahmad, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Khagen Kurmi, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srijan Samanta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazar Gul, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lymphedema of Tongue: Evaluation, Management and Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta,Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aakriti Baijal, Atal Bihari University, India.

(2) Ros Idayu Binti Mat Nawi, Institut Latihan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Elamparithi B, Tamilnadu. Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aakriti Baijal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ros Idayu Binti Mat Nawi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Elamparithi B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Higher Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Consuming Locally Brewed Alcohol in North-Central Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maii M.Nabieh, Egypt.

(2) Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Iraq.

(3) Ian James Martins, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alaa Hussein Hasan, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Ekta Rani, GGSMCH, India.

(3) Hamdy Abdelnaby Mahdy Hassan Elbassel, Nutrition National Institute, Egypt.

(4) Ian James Martins, Edtih Cowan University, Australia.

(5) Mona Mamoun Yousif Ahmed, Oman.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maii M.Nabieh, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ian James Martins, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Non-Surgical Endodontic Management of an Extraoral Cutaneous Sinus Tract of a Two Canal Mandibular Canine with Instrument Separation: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Prajakta Ganesh Chougule, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Elham Jafari, Iran.

(3) Divya D, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Melinda Szekely, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania.

(2) Mohit Zarekar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prajakta Ganesh Chougule, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elham Jafari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divya D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA