Peer Review History: Probeads-EC probiotic supplementation: Novel approaches to improve growth performance in Aseel cross chicks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Walaa Hussein Khalifa, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Hadeel Mohammed Hameed, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Dawood Saleem, University of Manara, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Walaa Hussein Khalifa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hadeel Mohammed Hameed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Endophytes and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Enhancing Flower Yield and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Komala, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shubham Kumar Yadav, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farkad Hawas Musa, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Ma. Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico.

(3) Maria Helena De Aguiar Pereira E Pestana, ISCTE-iul. Lisbon University, Portugal.

(4) Nada Hussein Al-Amer, Al-Furat University. College of Agricultural Engineering, Syria.

(5) Satam Sachin Bajirao, Dr. B.S. Konkan Agricultural University, India.

(6) Shukri I. Rekani, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Komala, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nitrogen Levels on Growth, Yield and Quality of Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria L. (Mol.) Standl.] in Balaghat Region, (M.P.), India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Gautam, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

(2) Diksha Sinha, CSK HPKV Palampur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anand Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diksha Sinha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Yield-contributing Traits in Ash Gourd Using Correlation and Path Coefficient Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Somil Singh Chauhan, Medicaps University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Laxman Navi, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Somil Singh Chauhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microalgal Systems for Efficient CO₂ Utilization and Carbon Sequestration: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamanna Begam, DBS PG College Kanpur, India.

(2) Dan Cirjan, Petroleum, Gas University of Ploiesti, Romania.

(3) Divyanshi Sharma, AKTU Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.P.Bhaskar, ICAR_NBSS&LUP, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tamanna Begam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dan Cirjan, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divyanshi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Profile of pfcrt, pfmdr-1 and K13 Propeller genes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Bouaflé, Bondoukou and Séguéla, Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shankar Srinivasan, School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Inneke Kusumawati Susanto, M. Biomed, Krida Wacana Christian University (UKRIDA), Indonesia.

(2) Basima Abdulfatah Albadrani, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Erian de Almeida Santos, Health Surveillance Foundation, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amarachi Chinasa Achigamonye, University Of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Oleke Felix, Lira University, Uganda.

(3) Olubunmi A. Olalekan, The Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Inneke Kusumawati Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basima Abdulfatah Albadrani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Erian de Almeida Santos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Marker-Assisted Selection for Elite Soybean Development: I. Parental Polymorphism Survey Using Core SSR Markers for Null KTI and LOX2 Alleles

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Aiman Malik, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Ahmed Mahmood Rajab, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aiman Malik, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Mahmood Rajab, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity, Development and Management of Insect Galls: Insights into Gall Infestation on Silkworm Food Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ivan Pavlovic, Scientific Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Serbia,Serbia.

(2) Prasanna Babu Racheeti, Shree Velagapudi Ramakrishna Memorial College, India.

(3) Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, University of Ebolowa, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukhpal Kaur, Desh Bhagat University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ivan Pavlovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasanna Babu Racheeti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phylogenetic insights of Phytochrome A homologs in legumes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Nur Aifiah Binti Ibrahim, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) R. Vanlalpeka, Mizoram University, India.

(3) Mehmet ULAS, Olive Research Institute, Türkiye.

(4) Kumud Dubey, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farshid Talat, AREEO, Iran.

(2) R.S.Pavithra, Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nur Aifiah Binti Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Vanlalpeka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehmet ULAS, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kumud Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation and Path Analysis in Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) for Growth and Yield Traits under Hill Zone of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Divyesh Vasava, India.

(2) Tran Van Minh, Vietnam National University, Vietnam.

(3) Jamal-Ali Olfati, University of Guilan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divyesh Vasava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tran Van Minh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jamal-Ali Olfati, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA