Peer Review History: An Overview of Methods for Activity Graph Study of Movements

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qing-Wen Wang, Shanghai University, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Radha Krishna Karne, CMR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India.

(2) Myna R, Erode Sengunthar Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radha Krishna Karne, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Myna R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Learning in Robotics Teleoperation: Understanding Competence through Eye Fixation Data

Editor(s):

(1) Prof David Coman, The Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehrdad Esmaeilipour, Azad University of Booshehr City, Iran.

(2) Seda Yetkin Yesil, Bitlis Eren University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehrdad Esmaeilipour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seda Yetkin Yesil, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sprouted Flaxseed in Functional Foods: A Comprehensive Review on Nutritional Enhancement, Formulation Strategies and Omega-3 Delivery Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivani Pannu, Desh Bhagat University, India.

(2) M. Kirthy Reddy, College of Food Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivani Pannu,  India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Kirthy Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cassia Fistula Fruit as a Novel Source of Nutraceutical Wine

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Pulipati Sowjanya, India.

(2) Amin Mohammed Alwaseai, Republic of Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raju Lal Bhardwaj, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pulipati Sowjanya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amin Mohammed Alwaseai, Republic of Yemen) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Bacterial Isolates from Urinary Catheter Patients in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Jwher Saleh, Iraq.

(2) Mahfam Alijaniha, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences , Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monika Sultana, Primeasia University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Jwher Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahfam Alijaniha, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Temporal Dynamics of Enhanced Host Susceptible (EHS) Phase in Resistant and Susceptible Brassica juncea Accessions to Myzus persicae Infestation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Gupta, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) N. P. Pathan, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. P. Pathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Substrates, Cultivation Conditions and NPK on the Production of Teak Seedlings Tectona grandis Linn. f., Verbenaceae from Strains, Daloa (Haut Sassandra, Ivory Coast)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Christopher Cullis, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

(2) Prof. ABROUKI Younes, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) O. Roger Anderson, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, USA.

(2) Mhaiskar Priya Rajendra, Forest College and Research Institute, SKLTSHU, India.

(3) Sreedhar Bodiga, Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu (Sri Konda Laxman Telangana Horticultural University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manju Giri, Nepal poly-technique Institute (NPI), Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (O. Roger Anderson, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mhaiskar Priya Rajendra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sreedhar Bodiga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Loan Management Practices on Financial Performance of Umurenge Saving and Credit Cooperatives in Nyanza District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Assifuah-Nunoo, Florida Atlantic University, United States of America.

(2) S. M. Akber, R. P. Shaha University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Ogidan, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Ramesh Vankadoth, St Joseph Degree College (Autonomous) Osmania University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Assifuah-Nunoo, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. M. Akber, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Validation of the Assam Rural Livelihood and Farming Scale (ARLFS) for the Socio-Economic Assessment of Khuti System Dwellers, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Lizardo Oscanoa Gamarra, Instituto De Innovacion Agraria, Peru.

(2) Geeta Singh, JNKVV Jabalpur MP, India.

(3) Kamakula N Murthy, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luis Lizardo Oscanoa Gamarra, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamakula N Murthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield, Quality and Economics of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, India.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Nagarajan, Saveetha Univesrity, India.

(2) R. Ravikumar, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(3) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dahmouni Said, Algeria.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Nagarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Ravikumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA