Peer Review History: Innovation and Improvement in Weeding Technology: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) HS Pandey, ICAR-Indian Sugarcane Research Institute, India.

(2) Neeraj Kumar Singh, Mahamaya College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kommanaboyina Raju Yadav, Rvs Technical Campus, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (HS Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neeraj Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Synergy for Zinc and Iron Biofortification: Enhancing Crop Nutrition Through Plant-Microbe Interactions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek, University of Horticultural Sciences Bagalkot, India.

(2) Dr. Neeraj Nath Parihar , Sardar Patel University Balaghat , India.

(3) Eslam Ahmed Gassm Alssed Mohamed, Agricultural Research Corporation , Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dr. Neeraj Nath Pariha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eslam Ahmed Gassm Alssed Mohamed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sensory Evaluation of Triploid (AAB& ABB) Banana Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) C.Mabel Joshaline, Arul Anandar College, India.

(2) Mileide dos Santos Ferreira, Brazil.

(3) Domingos Afonso Domingos, Higher Polytechnic Institute of Gaza, Mozambique.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sabina Khatun, India.

(2) Senthil Kumar J, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C.Mabel Joshaline, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mileide dos Santos Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Domingos Afonso Domingos, Mozambique) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climatic Signals of Drying in a Himalayan Watershed: A Multi-grid Precipitation Analysis of Bhilangana River Basin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) N. J. Sathe, India.

(2) John Adekunle Adesina, Nanjing Forestry University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. J. Sathe, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Adekunle Adesina, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Urine Profiling as a Source of Biomarker in Cancer Detection: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, USA

Reviewers:

(1) S.T. Gopukumar, Saveetha University, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(2) Ruchira Dubey, Shri Ram Murti Samark Institue Of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Sanatan Majhi, Utkal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhirenkumar Babubhai Bhoi, Veterinary College, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.T. Gopukumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruchira Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanatan Majhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Treating a Co-existence of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Psoriasis with Secukinumab: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy

Reviewers:

(1) Jayachandra Kuncha, USA.

(2) Shoaeb Mohammad Syed, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayachandra Kuncha, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shoaeb Mohammad Syed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Consumer Concerns on Food Safety in Goat Meat Distribution Channels: Evidence from Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Fayaz Khan, Institute of Business and Policy Research, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(2) Jyothsna Devi Kuchipudi, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Fayaz Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyothsna Devi Kuchipudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: What Drives Students to Invest?: Empirical Insight from the Capital Market Landscape

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics,  China

Reviewers:

(1) Shahil Raza, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(2) A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhijit Biswas, Globsyn Business School and Tranzanalytics, India.

(2) Adil Hakeem Khan, India.

(3) Ashok Jhawar, IPS Academy, Institute of Business Management & Research, India.

(4) Kexin Wu, Alumnus of Cornell University, USA.

(5) Krishnamoorthi M, Kristu Jayanti College (Autonomous), India.

(6) MF. Arrozi Adhikara, Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia.

(7) Nishita Thakrar, Atmiya University, India.

(8) Sourav Kumar Das, International School of Business & Media Kolkata, India.

(9) Thomas Muthucattu Paul, Papua new Guinea University of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahil Raza, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Non-strabismic Binocular Vision Anomalies in Myopic and Hypermetropic Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sankhajyoti Saha, NSHM Knowledge Campus Kolkata, India.

(2) Arman Abdous, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(2) Mona Abdelkader, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sankhajyoti Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arman Abdous, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Multi-Algorithmic Approach to Stroke Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Harekrushna Sutar, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ripalkumar Patel, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, RC PATH LONDIN. UK.

(3) D. Pinsara de Silva , National Hospital Galle, Sri lanka.

(4) Dr. Sunday Adelakun, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nithin A K, Marthoma College of Special Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/110

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ripalkumar Patel, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Kodzo-Grey Veny, UK) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (D. Pinsara de Silva , Sri lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Dr. Sunday Adelakun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA