Peer Review History: Determination of Antioxidant Capacity in aqueous extracts of Corymbia citriodora Using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, TPC, and Hydrogen Peroxide Assays

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viktar Lemiasheuski, Belarusian State University, Republic of Belarus.

Reviewers:

(1) Ausama Abdulwahab Safar, Salahaddin University- Erbil, Iraq.

(2) Adel A. M. Saeed, University of Aden, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gama Mohan M G, MS University, India.

(2) N. RABITA, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Natarajan Sampathkumar, SSM College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ausama Abdulwahab Safar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adel A. M. Saeed, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Competency Skills among Secondary School Teachers Working in Tribal Areas in Relation to Demographic Variables, Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohit Dixit, Parishkar College Of Global Excellence, India.

(2) Padma Priya P V, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Rinkal Sharma, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohit Dixit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padma Priya P V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rinkal Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Navigating Mobility and Livelihoods: An Empirical Study of Two Wheeler Taxi Services in Mon Town, Nagaland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanumant Bhajantri, Central University of Kerala, India.

(2) Pallabi Mukherjee, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanumant Bhajantri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pallabi Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Focal Cemento-osseous Dysplasia Expansive Type: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Malamatenia Bourazani, Greece.

(2) Shanthakumar S, India.

(3) Yeganeh Arian, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malamatenia Bourazani, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shanthakumar S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yeganeh Arian, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF ETHANOIC LEAF EXTRACT OF MENTHA PIPERITA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bobby Prasad, India.

(2) Aseer Manilal, Komar University of Science and Technology, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Ambade, H. V. Desai College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bobby Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aseer Manilal, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impediments Faced by Farmers apropos ICT-based Agro-met Advisory Services

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Vicky Yadav, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajie Lambert Junior, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Geeta Singh, JNKVV, India.

(3) Zakia Himeur, INRA Algeria, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aditya Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vicky Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Bio-Pesticide Market in Khordha District of Odisha, India: A Study on Market Intermediaries’ Attitudes and Behaviors

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Arshdeep Singh, India.

(2) Anupama Sundar D, JSS Science and Technology University, India.

(3) Le Trung Hieu, Tra Vinh University, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chitranka K, National School of Business, India.

(2) Despina Popovska Stojanov, “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University in Skopje, North Macedonia.

(3) G.P. Sunandini, PJTAU, India.

(4) Khalid Joya, Kiel University, Germany.

(5) Mudasir Rashid Bhat, SKUAST-K, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arshdeep Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anupama Sundar D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Le Trung Hieu,Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Screening, Proximate Analysis and Phyto-synthesis of Zinc Oxide Metallic Nanoparticles from the Leaf of Abutilon persicum (Burm. F.) Merr. and their Biological Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Endang Tri Wahyuni, Gadhah Mada University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Natarajan Sampathkumar, SSM College of Arts and Science (C-68064), India.

(2) A. Shanmugarathinam, University College of Engineering, Bharathidasan Institute Of Technology, Anna University, India.

(3) Dhondiram Tukaram Sakhare. Shivaji Art’s, Comm. & Science College Kannad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Michael Odoi Kyene, Centre for Plant Medicine Research, Ghana.

(2) Uday S Senapati, Handique Girls’ College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Natarajan Sampathkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Shanmugarathinam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhondiram Tukaram Sakhare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Organic Amendments on the Growth and Yield Performance of Naked Oat (Avena nuda L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Hassan Sayyari Zahan, University of Birjand, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kareem, Mariam Olamide, United States.

(2) Yashwant Singh Tariyal, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kareem, Mariam Olamide, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yashwant Singh Tariyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Standardization of a Ready-to-Cook Foxtail Millet Khichdi Premix Enriched with Green Gram, Oats and Textured Soy Protein

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Kshitiz Pokhrel, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.

(2) Yemane Habtemichael Gebremeskal, ITMO University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kshitiz Pokhrel, Czech Republic) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yemane Habtemichael Gebremeskal, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA