Peer Review History: Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Ulna: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Patnala Mohan Patro, GITAM Deemed to be  University, Visakhapatnam, AP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Revathishree, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute , Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Kiran Kumar Mukhopadhyay, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, India.

(3) Gadhwal Khayati Hasmukhbhai, Anand Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Revathishree, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiran Kumar Mukhopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gadhwal Khayati Hasmukhbhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Visceral Adiposity Index and Leptin Levels in Type 2 Diabetics in Port Harcourt: Effects of Disease Duration and Sex

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Juhi Aggarwal, SGT University, India.

(2) Prerna Agarwal, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juhi Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prerna Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review of Text Generation: From NLP to Hybrid Mechanisms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Rahmanipur, Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran.

(2) Rahul Jain, Marwadi University, India.

(3) Ajatashatru Samal, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Prakash, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Rashmi S. Gaikwad, Walchand College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Rahmanipur, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ajatashatru Samal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Petroleum Applications and their Benefits Using Artificial Intelligence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ubaid Asif Farooqui, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

(2) Chinchu Joseph, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, India.

(3) Girmay Mengesha Azanaw, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Godwin Ededem, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Praise Ekeopara, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ubaid Asif Farooqui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinchu Joseph, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Girmay Mengesha Azanaw, Ethiopias) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Hidden Challenges of Building a Scalable Data Clean Room

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejesh Reddy Singasani, University of Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Naimil Gadani, USA.

(3) Venkata Reddy Thummala, USA.

(4) Hina Gandhi, Northeastern University, United States Of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Karthigayan Devan, United States.

(2) Karthigayan Devan, USA.

(3) Mamatha C M, India.

(4) Pavan Nutalapati, USA.

(5) Ravi Patharia, Government Holkar (Model, Autonomous) Science College, India.

(6) Swapneel Raosaheb Khandagale, India.

(7) Virendra Kumar Tiwari, Lakshmi Narain College Of Technology (MCA), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.375/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejesh Reddy Singasani, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naimil Gadani, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Venkata Reddy Thummala, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hina Gandhi, United States Of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dose-Dependent Toxicological Effects of Smoked Fish Extract on Liver and Kidney Function in Albino Rats: Implications for Human Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio Altieri, Sapienza University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Assogba Martinien Hospice Mahussi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin.

(2) Youssef Salama, University Moulay Ismail,   Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Assogba Martinien Hospice Mahussi, Republic of Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Youssef Salama, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Internet Reliance, Social Interaction, and Pragmatic Language Skills of Freshmen Education Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Atila YILDIRIM, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sulipi Biswas, India.

(2) P. Sajida Bhanu, BS Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sulipi Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Sajida Bhanu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Factors that Restrain Listening Skill Improvement among English Learners: A Systematic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy,University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) S Archana, Anurag University, India.

(2) Muhd Zulkifli Ismail, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S Archana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhd Zulkifli Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Use of Drop Everything and Read (DEAR) in Teaching Reading among Grade VI Pupils at Dassun Elementary School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Syifa Dwi Mutiah, Indonesia.

(2) Angeline L. Ramos, Basilan State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Melanie C. Caňo, Southville VI Elementary School, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syifa Dwi Mutiah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angeline L. Ramos, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Limited Access to ICT and Interactive Visualization Tools and Its Impact on the Math Performance of Intermediate Pupils at Dangguinan Elementary School, Apayao

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Martin L. Nobis, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Kholekile Herbert Ntsobi, Kwa Zulu Natal College of Emergency Care, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Martin L. Nobis, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kholekile Herbert Ntsobi, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2