Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) V.N.Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(2) Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, University College of Technology , Osmania University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.N.Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) A Rose Enid Teresa, India.

(2) Aakash Rajeshkumar Suthar, L J University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ver Gabriel Albert Wuese, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A Rose Enid Teresa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aakash Rajeshkumar Suthar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shoryabh Srivastava, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Hari Shankar Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raz Mohammad Stori, Urozgan Institute of Higher Education, Afghanistan.

(2) S. Raut, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, RRS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shoryabh Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hari Shankar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Addikarige Nalinda Nuwan, Sri lanka.

(2) Santu Samanta, Ramnagar College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Mudassar Hussain, National University of Modern Languages, Pakistan.

(2) Sindu Padmanabhan, Australia.

(3) Veena Angadi, GS College of Management, Bangalore City University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Addikarige Nalinda Nuwan, Sri lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santu Samanta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhanya Nath, India.

(2) Mohammed Hamad Saleh, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shekhmous H. Hussen, University of Duhok, Iraq.

(2) Sudhanya Nath, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhanya Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Hamad Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Hatil Hashim EL-Kamali, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

(2) Farah T.O.Al-Jumaili, Al- Nahrain university, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Magdy Mahmoud Mohamed, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hatil Hashim EL-Kamali, Sudan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farah T.O.Al-Jumaili, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunjida Khan, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh.

(2) Aman Mishra, Sakaldiha Post Graduate College, India.

(3) Zar Shah, University of Bergamo, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bykov Alexander, Russian State Agrarian University, Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Russia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunjida Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zar Shah, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Doina Bein, California State University Fullerton, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ronakkumar Bathani, USA.

(2) Nankong Achana Francis, Jain University, India.

(3) Angkita Borpatra Gohain, Golaghat Commerce College, India.

(4) Ajatashatru Samal, Visvesvaraya Technological University or Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S Durga, Vignan Foundation for Science Technology and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ronakkumar Bathani, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nankong Achana Francis, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Angkita Borpatra Gohain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ajatashatru Samal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Hussein, Benha University, Egypt.

(2) Mamata Garanayak, KISS Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arefeh Seif, Shiraz University, Iran.

(2) Areej M. Abduldaim, University of Technology, Iraq.

(3) Eoin Mackall, University of California Santa Cruz, USA.

(4) Gibbs O’Daniel Kawinga, Mind Valley Institute, Zimbabwe.

(5) Sara Benatmane, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa Hussein, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mamata Garanayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1)  Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasannakumar J K, Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Miguel Armando Lopez-Beltran, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Mexico.

(3) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar, Scientific Research Institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Ashok Chhatre, India.

(2) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(3) Fahmi Fuadah, Immanuel Health Institute, Indonesia.

(4) Ghassen Abid, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC), Tunisia.

(5) Haraprasad Bairagya, Kasemnagar N.A.J. High School (H.S.), India.

(6) Leonardo Ornella, Spain.

(7) Michael Olisa Nwankwo, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasannakumar J K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miguel Armando Lopez-Beltran, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA