Peer Review History: From Framework to Practice: Barriers and Enablers to RMF Adoption in Mid-sized Enterprises

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Piyush Raja, India.

(2) Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Bahria University Lahore Campus, Pakistan.

(3) R.Priscilla Joy, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aradhana Sahu, Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

(3) W Sarada, RBVRR Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Priscilla Joy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adsorptive Removal of Oils from Oil Spillage: Kinetic and Isotherm Studies Using Raw and Chemically Modified Pentaclethra macrophylla Seed Pods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bikram Keshari Das, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Koplamma Nenchini Bala, Admiralty University, Nigeria.

(2) Aduloju Emmanuel I, University Sains, Malaysia.

(3) Kavita Gour, RTMNU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Koplamma Nenchini Bala, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aduloju Emmanuel I, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kavita Gour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the Types, Growing Conditions, and Production Process of Millet Based on Botanical Features

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abeer A. Ahmed, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Widad M. Taher Al-Asadi, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abeer A. Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Widad M. Taher Al-Asadi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Ibadan Experience

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Blagica Krsteska, University Ss.Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, North Macedonia.

(2) Muhammad Arsalan Khan, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Blagica Krsteska, North Macedonia ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Arsalan Khan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Local Sesame Tahini

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Raffaella Preti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jelang Jelku D. Sangma, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Palash Manoj Thakre, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Amir, Bahauddinn Zakaria University, Pakistan.

(2) Sadiq    Ismaila  Shina, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria.

(3) Usman Ahmad, Federal Directorate Of Education Islamabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jelang Jelku D. Sangma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Palash Manoj Thakre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Project Management Information System (PMIS) on Project Management Practices in Delta State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitesti University Center Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezeala George, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Shilpa Narang, Canterbury Institute of Management, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhdin Zeyne Shifa, Werabe Universityz, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezeala George, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa Narang, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Time Series Prediction for Traffic Flow Forecasting Using CNN

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rohit Rastogi, ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad, India.

(2) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(3) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Jenifer, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Md Rokibul Hasan, Gannon University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marwane Benhadou, Morocco.

(2) Murali Malempati, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Jenifer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Rokibul Hasan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morpho-Anatomical and Pharmacognostic Properties of Whitfieldia elongata (P. Beauv.) De Wild. & T. Durand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shri Kant Tripathi, Mizoram University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Gupta, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University (AKTU), India.

(2) Mohammed Abdul Rasheed Naikodi, National Research Institute of Unani Medicine for Skin Disorders, India.

(3) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Paweena Porrawatkul, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(2) Shital Phuse, Sant Gadagebaba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Abdul Rasheed Naikodi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Justin R Nayagam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mapping the Scientific Landscape of Water Footprint in Agriculture: A Global Bibliometric Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghetiya Radhika Lalitkumar, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Edilza Martins Da Silva, UNIOESTE, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Аnvarovich, Scientific Research Institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghetiya Radhika Lalitkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Edilza Martins Da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Smooth Muscle Actin and Cytokeratin 5/6 as Markers of Basallike Classification among Sudanese Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Kumar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) P.Jovita.M.Martin Daniel, MGM Cancer Institute, India.

(3) Divya Sharma, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amar Kustura, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(2) Bayram Bayram, Şirnak University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.Jovita.M.Martin Daniel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divya Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA