Peer Review History: Credit Availability and Consumer Investments in Risky Financial Assets: Mobile Payments, Financial Education and Financial Satisfaction as Mediators

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Mijarul Islam, Barasat College, India.

(2) Vibhuti Shivam Dube, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.Madhuri, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(2) Pallavi G P, Tumkur University, Sri Siddhartha Institute of Management Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mijarul Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vibhuti Shivam Dube, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Analysis of Grain Yield and Its Associated Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Murugaragavan Ramasamy , Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Wayan Wangiyana, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

(2) Florin Sala, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

(3) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

(4) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(5) Satish Narayan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(6) Wayan Wangiyana, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murugaragavan Ramasamy , India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wayan Wangiyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Endophytic Microbiota of Diverse Apple Cultivars Reveals Cultivar-specific Microbial Associations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kistu Singh Nongthombam, Kumbi College, India.

(2) Venkatesan Govindan, Mannai Rajagopalaswami Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kistu Singh Nongthombam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venkatesan Govindan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Conservation Status of Fish from Charipunia Beel of Morigaon District, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Atul Kumar Jain, Ornamental Fisheries Training and Research Institute, India.

(2) Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, MB Patel College, RTMNU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pijush Payra, Ramnagar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atul Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resilience, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Combat Climate Change for a Sustainable Future

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey, National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Sasirekhamani, Thulasi College of Arts and Science for Women, India.

(2) Ishraque Bin Khalil, Environment and Resource Analysis Center (ENRAC), Bangladesh.

(3) Saurabh Samdarshi, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fredrick Kayusi, Maasai Mara University, Kenya.

(2) M.Sasirekhamani, Thulasi College of Arts and Science for Women, India.

(3) Parveen Kumar Garg, Guru Kashi University, India.

(4) M.Sasirekhamani, Thulasi College Of Arts And Science For Women, India.

(5) Sofyan Sufri, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Sasirekhamani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ishraque Bin Khalil, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saurabh Samdarshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Turmeric Powder (Curcuma longa) as Growth Promoter in Cross Bred Hampshire Pigs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Federal Polytechnic, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Marinela Enculescu, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Saleem, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China.

(2) Ihejirika Uchechi Daureen Gift, Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Roozbeh Fallahi, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Nigeria) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Assessment of Combining Ability and Per se Performance of CGMS Based Hybrids in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Through L×T Design

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

(2) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Imamuddin Shah, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, MJM Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Valluru Manju Vani, KVK, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.Ranjith Raja Ram, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University (TNAU), India.

(2) Subhamoy Sikder, Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imamuddin Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Valluru Manju Vani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Supermassive Black Holes and Galactic Evolution: Insights from Observations and Simulations

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Magdy Rabie Soliman Sanad, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yang I. Cao, Switzerland.

(2) Michele Nardelli, Federico II University, Italy.

(3) Gabriel Roberto Hauschild Roier, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(4) Policarpo Yoshin Ulianov, UFSC – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(5) Arsal Kamal, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Tamrakar, St. Thomas College, India.

(2) Bhuvaneshwari Kashi, Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics, India.

(3) Ezeugo Jeremiah Chukwuemerie, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(4) Mrigendra Kumar Singh, Raja Rammana Centre for Advanced Technology, India.

(5) Paolo Christillin, Universita di Pisa, Italy.

(6) Suryakanta Swain, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

(7) Ubah O.L, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yang I. Cao, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Michele Nardelli, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gabriel Roberto Hauschild Roier, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Policarpo Yoshin Ulianov, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Arsal Kamal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Living Conditions of Mahouths and Their Awareness Towards Welfare Program: A Socioeconomic Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação And Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Udit Maheshwari, India.

(2) Darade Rustum Hanumant, Samarth College of Engineering and Management, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darade Rustum Hanumant, Samarth College of Engineering and Management, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udit Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darade Rustum Hanumant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Characterization of HSP60 Gene in Poonchi Chicken

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhanya Nath, India.

(2) Atindra Karar, British Society for Gene & Cell Therapy, India.

(3) Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Ghafer Hussein, Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Manoj Kumar, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Nagam Khudhair Mahdi, University of Anbar, Education College for Women, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhanya Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atindra Karar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA