Peer Review History: Development and Validation of Self-Regulation Scale among Late Adolescents

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Bharathi, MMM College of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Radhika Injamuri, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Shazia Tahira, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avi Choudhary, Banarsidas Chandiwala Institute of Physiotherapy, India.

(2) Kalpak Chaudhuri, Royal University of Bhutan, India.

(3) Rohan Singh, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.46/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhika Injamuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shazia Tahira, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Computational Thinking in Graduate Education: Curriculum Reform in Modern Sensing and Control Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Fredy Sosa Gutierrez, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Peru.

(3) Nofamataro Zebua, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Malik Ibrahim, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia.

(2) Thuong T. N. Dinh, The University of Danang – University of Science and Education, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fredy Sosa Gutierrez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nofamataro Zebua, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: How NGOs Shape Agricultural Technology Dissemination in Coastal Andhra Pradesh: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Japhet Omaye, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Ekene Cynthia Onukwulu, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ciocnitu (Stoiconi) Claudia Ramoma, University of Oradea, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Japhet Omaye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ekene Cynthia Onukwulu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rural Teachers’ Perspectives on Continuous Professional Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahadi Hasan Bappy, Bangladesh.

(2) Alexis Arizabal- Enriquez, University of Abra, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahadi Hasan Bappy, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alexis Arizabal- Enriquez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sensory Evaluation of Complementary Foods Developed Using Malted Grains Flour to Overcome Malnutrition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Salha Yustus Selemani, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania.

(2) Eli Zughumnaan Well, Benue State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gashaw Muluken Tessera, Bio and Emerging Technology Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salha Yustus Selemani, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eli Zughumnaan Well, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association between Maternal Dietary Intake and Neonatal Anthropometry: A Healthcare Based Study of Bilaspur District, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Suzan Samir Elsharkawy, Alexandria University, Egypt.

(2) Dagnechew Degefu, Texila American University, Ethiopia.

(3) Swapnil C Raskar, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akanksha Sharma, UPUMS, India.

(2) Suzan Samir Elsharkawy, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suzan Samir Elsharkawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dagnechew Degefu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swapnil C Raskar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Evaporation Using Long Short Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit Based Neural Network

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Michel Mainguenaud, University Avenue, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinchu Joseph, India.

(2) Udaya Kumar Addanki, Anurag University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abwabul Jinan, Satya Terra Bhinneka University, Indonesia.

(2) Djida Ayad, France.

(3) K.Phani Rama Krishna, PVP Siddhartha Institute of Technology, India.

Nuhu Steven Kuba, Plateau State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinchu Joseph, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udaya Kumar Addanki, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance and Environmental Impact of a 45 kWp Rooftop Grid-connected Solar PV System in a Semi-arid Academic Campus: A Case Study from Western India

Editor(s):

(1) Professor, Cheng-Fu Yang,National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Kar, Tolani Maritime Institute Pune, India.

(2) Monaem Elmnifi, Bright Star University, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B Navothna, Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, India.

(2) Fadhil Mahmood Oleiwi, University of Technology, Iraq.

(3) Pushp Rai Mishra, India.

(4) Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monaem Elmnifi, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Control of Reproduction in Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus 1758) Using Kola acuminata Seeds Powder as Reproduction Inhibitor

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph A. Olugbojo, Bells University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Niko A. Macaraeg, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adam Robisalmi, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

(2) Alex Barakagira, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph A. Olugbojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niko A. Macaraeg, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Traditional Preservatives on the Acidity and Microbial Composition of Palm Wine in Tiko (South West Region) Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University Nairobi, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Okiakpe Rolina, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Swathi Suddala, University of Wisconsin, USA.

(3) Soumyashree Mansingh, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Okiakpe Rolina, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swathi Suddala, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Soumyashree Mansingh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA