Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kistu Singh Nongthombam, Kumbi College, India.

(2) Venkatesan Govindan, Mannai Rajagopalaswami Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kistu Singh Nongthombam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venkatesan Govindan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Atul Kumar Jain, Ornamental Fisheries Training and Research Institute, India.

(2) Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, MB Patel College, RTMNU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atul Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey, National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Sasirekhamani, Thulasi College of Arts and Science for Women, India.

(2) Ishraque Bin Khalil, Environment and Resource Analysis Center (ENRAC), Bangladesh.

(3) Saurabh Samdarshi, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Sasirekhamani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ishraque Bin Khalil, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saurabh Samdarshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Federal Polytechnic, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Marinela Enculescu, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Nigeria) | File 1 |File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

(2) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Imamuddin Shah, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, MJM Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Valluru Manju Vani, KVK, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imamuddin Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash Shivaji Jondhale, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Valluru Manju Vani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Magdy Rabie Soliman Sanad, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yang I. Cao, Switzerland.

(2) Michele Nardelli, Federico II University, Italy.

(3) Gabriel Roberto Hauschild Roier, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(4) Policarpo Yoshin Ulianov, UFSC – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(5) Arsal Kamal, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yang I. Cao, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Michele Nardelli, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gabriel Roberto Hauschild Roier, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Policarpo Yoshin Ulianov, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Arsal Kamal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação And Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Udit Maheshwari, India.

(2) Darade Rustum Hanumant, Samarth College of Engineering and Management, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udit Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darade Rustum Hanumant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhanya Nath, India.

(2) Atindra Karar, British Society for Gene & Cell Therapy, India.

(3) Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhanya Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atindra Karar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arturs Niedritis, Latvia.

(2) Ana Margarida Duarte Silva Vieira, University of Algarve, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arturs Niedritis, Latvia) | File 1 |File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ana Margarida Duarte Silva Vieira, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohsin Ahemad Mustak Ahemad Sheikh, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohsin Ahemad Mustak Ahemad Sheikh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2