Editor(s):

(1) Kristina Mastanjević,J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek,Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar Panda, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammed Al-Jawasim, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

(3) Dovel Branquinho Ernesto, Instituto Superior Politecnico De Manica (ISPM), Mozambique.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar Panda, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Al-Jawasim, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dovel Branquinho Ernesto, Mozambique) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajaykumar Soni, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Marija Zheplinska, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajaykumar Soni India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marija Zheplinska Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiro Horiuchi, Hannan University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumitro Chakravarty, Birla Institute Of Technology, India.

(2) Anjali Nenwani, The CVM University, India.

(3) Cornelia Ifeoma Ejoh, University of the District of Columbia, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumitro Chakravarty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anjali Nenwani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cornelia Ifeoma Ejoh, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Waleed Mohamed El-Hanafey fekry, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Chandra Kant Saxena, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, India.

(3) Hamid Hammood Mhawesh , University Thi-Qar  College Of Agriculture And Marshes, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 ( Waleed Mohamed El-Hanafey fekry, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandra Kant Saxena, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hamid Hammood Mhawesh, Iraq ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Institute of Forage Crops, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Eltayeb Ahmed Hamad Suliman, Sudan.

(2) Selay Dogan, Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eltayeb Ahmed Hamad Suliman, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Selay Dogan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejeswari Sahu, Vignan Institute Of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(2) Aradhya Abrol, Geisinger Medical Center, United States.

(3) Mohammed Abdulhameed Younis, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejeswari Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aradhya Abrol, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Abdulhameed Younis, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Inci, Bingol University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Taufik Hayimad, Princess of Naradhiwas University, Thailand.

(2) Dhaval Prajapati, Ganpat University, India.

(3) Shiffa Ul Ain, MNS University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(4) Hasim Hasim, Gorontalo State University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Taufik Hayimad, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhaval Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiffa Ul Ain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hasim Hasim, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Marcelo Antonio Nero, UFMG – Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) John Chinedu Obianke, University of Delta, Nigeria.

(3) Kumar Adarsh, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Institute Of Dental Sciences, India.

(4) Niti Dharmendra Shah, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marcelo Antonio Nero, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Chinedu Obianke, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kumar Adarsh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Niti Dharmendra Shah, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Omofunmilola, Eunice O., Yaba College of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Heidy Jultje Manangkot, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omofunmilola, Eunice O, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heidy Jultje Manangkot, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers: 

(1) Edy Suseno, Indonesia.

(2) SAWITRI SUWANAROA, RAJAMANGALA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY LANNA , THAILAND.

(3) NOEL P. MUNDA, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Edy Suseno, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (SAWITRI SUWANAROA, THAILAND) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (NOEL P. MUNDA, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA