Peer Review History: Role of Immune Checkpoints (PD-1, PDL1 and CTLA-4) In Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Therapeutic Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Senior Lecturer, Dr. Moewardi General Teaching Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadaf Shafi Gadoo, Government Medical College, India.
(2) Nilesh Dattatray Jadhav, MIMER Medical College, India.
(3) Salini K, University of Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadaf Shafi Gadoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilesh Dattatray Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Salini K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Algae Biofilm Produced from Anaerobic Digester Wastewater Demonstrated as Biofertilizer for Dwarf Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Phindile Madikizela, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, South Africa.

(2) Disha Agarwal, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Domga Richard, University Of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

(2) Olajumoke Christiana Oyekanmi, University of Delaware, United States.

(3) Thiago Simonato Mozer, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phindile Madikizela, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Disha Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria from Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum) Rhizosphere

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manikant Tripathi, Assistant Professor, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shimaa El-Syed Ibrahim Hassanein, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.
(2) Satyam, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth Rahuri, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shimaa El-Syed Ibrahim Hassanein, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satyam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pollination Strategies for Advancing Protected Cultivation of Vegetable Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Animal Production Techniques, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Chava Asritha, PJTAU, India.
(2) KRM Swamy, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enceng Sobari, Subang State Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Priyanka Sharma, Rajasthan University, India.

(3) Udit Joshi, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chava Asritha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KRM Swamy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Typology, Composition and Characterization of Urban Solid Waste in the Industrial Area of Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Research Center and Post Graduate All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Odeyemi Dolapo Funmi, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Onamade Akintunde Olaniyi, Caleb University, Nigeria.

(3) Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Onyenweife Ayadinuno, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Nigeria.

(2) Sodiq Alaka, Environment Agency, United Kingdom.

(3) Somnath Debnath, FCMA, School of Business and Enterprise, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

(4) Tesfaye Doboch, Arba Minch Water Technology Institute, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Odeyemi Dolapo Funmi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Onamade Akintunde Olaniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genotypic & Phenotypic Correlation Analysis for Yield and Economic Traits in Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
(2) Kedar Mahadev Gheware, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, India.
(3) Motapalukula Jyothi, MJPTBCW Residential B.Sc. Agriculture College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Sajjad, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kedar Mahadev Gheware, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Motapalukula Jyothi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Nutrient Management for Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana) in Lateritic Soils of Odisha: Effects on Growth, Yield and Economics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Sai Manideep, Technology and Research University, India.
(2) B. Rajendra Kumar, Agricultural College, India.
(3) Soumya Sucharita Sahoo, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Thapa, HNBGU (A Central University) , India.

(2) Singitham Akshitha, University Of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Soumya Sucharita Sahoo, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(4) Stuti Debapriya Behera, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan University, India.

(5) U. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Sai Manideep, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Rajendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Soumya Sucharita Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality of Fresh Pork Packed in Biodegradable Material in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Material under Frozen Storage

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Associate Professor, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Misde Yola, Indonesia.
(2) K. Sudheer, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nada Khaled Ali, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Misde Yola, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Sudheer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Common Fixed Point Results for Cubic Type Generalized (ψ − ϕ) Weak Contraction in b-Metric Spaces

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Revathy, Sri Sarada College for Women, India.
(2) Dasari Ratna Babu, PSCMR College of Engineering & Technology, India.
(3) Ehsan Lotfali Ghasab, Jundi Shapur University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maheshwari P.G, Government First Grade College, Krishnarajanagara, India.

(2) Kodeboina Bhanu Chander, PSCMR College of  Engineering & Technology, India.

(3) Megha Kishor Kothawade, Guru Gobind Singh College of Engineering & Research Centre, India.

(4) Rakesh Sarkar, Gour Mahavidyalaya, India.

(5) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India.

(6) Salwa Salman Abed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Revathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dasari Ratna Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ehsan Lotfali Ghasab, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Minimum Reduced Sombor Index of Unicyclic Graphs in Terms of the Girth

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ruben Dario Ortiz Ortiz, Universidad de Cartagena, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Havva KIRGIZ, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkiye.
(2) P. Nithya, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amalorpava Jerline J, India.

(2) Amene Alidadi, Tafresh University, Iran.

(3) Muhammad Danish, Mid Sweden University, Sweden.

(4) Randhir Singh, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(5) Ruhul Amin, Assam University, India.

(6) Syeda Asma Kauser, Global Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Havva KIRGIZ, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Nithya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA