Peer Review History: Paddy Crop Monitoring Using Landsat 8 and Sentinel Data: A Case Study in Kandi Mandal of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil R. Pimpale, College of Agriculture, Dr PDKV, India.

(2) Nardjes Hamini, Amar Telidji University of Laghouat, Algeria.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil kumar, India.

(2) Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil R. Pimpale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nardjes Hamini, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Documentation of Insect-pests in Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii H. Bolus) in Kerala and Their Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Geetha, Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rupak Kumar Nath, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Geetha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupak Kumar Nath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compatibility of Trichoderma asperellum (Tr-9) with Carbofuran and Cassava-based Biopesticide, Nanma under In-vitro Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaimaa Ahmed Nour, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Luiz Antonio Soares Cardoso, Instituto Federal de Educacao, Brazil.

(3) Kalyani Supriya, Himachal Pradesh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dwarka, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Ibrahim, Institute  Of Molecular Biology And Biotechnologies, Azerbaijan.

(3) Nikita Das, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Shilpi Rawat, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaimaa Ahmed Nour, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luiz Antonio Soares Cardoso, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kalyani Supriya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Spacing and Planting Method on Growth and Yield of Radish (Raphanus Sativus L) Under Contrasting Conditions of Dry and Wet Seasons

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Swarajya Laxmi Nayak, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Mohammed Al-Jawasim, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mdewa Steven, Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swarajya Laxmi Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Al-Jawasim, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of a Scale to Measure the Empowerment of Soliga Tribal Women in Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Doutora Ana Pedro, Aveiro University, Santiago Campus, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharath Samishetti, Balaji Institute of Management Sciences, India.

(2) Veerya Nayak, Kamala Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amar Vangad, SSR Institute of Management & Research, India.

(2) Vipin Kumar Misra, KVK East Kameng, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharath Samishetti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Veerya Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Supervised Machine Learning Models for COVID-19 Prediction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Cirruse Salehnasab, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Egwom Onyinyechi Jessica, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(3) Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, GITAM University Visakhapatnam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Milind Ankleshwar, India.

(2) Nitin Goyal, School of Engineering and Technology Central University of Haryana, India.

(3) Parakramaweera Sunil Dharmapala, U.S.A.

(4) Sunil Kumar, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.05/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cirruse Salehnasab, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Egwom Onyinyechi Jessica, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nitalaksheswara Rao Kolukula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Expectation of Freshman Retention Rate at University of Guam Based on Data Analysis: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Qing-Wen Wang, Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, P.R. China.

(2) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anisur Rahman, Hajigonj Degree College, Chandpur, Bangladesh.

(2) MAICHIKI, Isaac Peter, Nigeria.

(3) Radheshyam H. Gajghat, Sandip Institute of Technology & Research Centre, Nashik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radheshyam H. Gajghat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MAICHIKI, Isaac Peter, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anisur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Stressors on Academic Performance: A Case Study of Business Students in Karachi

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Gökhan Duman, Gazi University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Resmy Raj A, SDM Institute of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

(2) Ernest Boateng, Ghana.

(3) Mangalam Kumari, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Touil Driss, Higher Institute of Nursing and Health Techniques, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Resmy Raj A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ernest Boateng, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mangalam Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Studies on Staphylococcal Otitis in Dogs at Jabalpur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Valerii Ushkalov, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Matheus Garcia Lopes, Uniube Veterinary Hospital – Preceptorship, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Abubakar Jibril, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(3) R.P.Diwakar, Acharya Deva University of Ag.&Tech, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Valerii Ushkalov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matheus Garcia Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stature and Sex Estimation Using Anthropometric Parameters in the Yoruba Ethnic Group of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagriti Agrawal, Pt. J.N.M. Medical College, India.

(2) Vineeta Saini, SGT University, India.

(3) Netra Kumar Ojha, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagriti Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vineeta Saini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Netra Kumar Ojha, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA