Peer Review History: Household Food Insecurity and Its Associated Factors in Punjab, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Munmun Sengupta, University of Calcutta, India.

(2) N G Pradeep Kumar, Sri Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, T. Begur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Govinda Bahadur KC, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aditi Munmun Sengupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N G Pradeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano-Fertilizers on Growth and Yield Performance of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalida Ali Thejeel, Alkarkh University of Science , Iraq.

(2) Amjad  Abdul-Hadi  Mohammad , University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalida Ali Thejeel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amjad  Abdul-Hadi  Mohammad , Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-Driven Mining 4.0: A Systematic Review of Smart, Sustainable, and Autonomous Technologies Across the Mining Lifecycle

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Diyuan Li, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Reviewers:

(1) G Shobana, Loyola ICAM College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Amal Hameed Khaleel, Basrah University, Iraq.

(3) Satyaveer Singh, MMEC, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sadhana Priyadarshini, GITAM Univerisity, India.

(2) Sudarsan Biswas, RCCIIT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G Shobana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amal Hameed Khaleel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Satyaveer Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationships between Grade 11 Students’ Anxiety and Self-efficacy Compared to Their Mastery of Rational Functions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Archana Sarkar, Indukaka Ipcowala Institute of Management, Charotar University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Ray DeWitt, Hampton University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Archana Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ray DeWitt, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Impact of Total Quality Management on Organizational Behavior: A Comparative Study of Local Firms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Kong Siew Mui, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Md. Sajedur Rahman, Central University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ruhollah Nasiri, Iarn.

(2) Engr Uwadia Uche Festus, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kong Siew Mui, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Sajedur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Existence and Uniqueness of Fixed Point Results Using Compatible Maps of Type (K) in Generalized Fuzzy Metric Spaces

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) T Rakesh Singh, Aurora Higher Education and Research Academy, India.

(2) B. Revathy, Sri Sarada College for Women, India.

(3) Preeti Sengar, Vikram University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhilesh Jain, Corporate Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) M. Mohamed Althaf, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), India.

(3) M.Sornavalli, Velammal College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(4) S. Sowndrarajan, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T Rakesh Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Revathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Preeti Sengar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mathematical Modeling and Equilibrium Analysis of Early Life Stress Using a Modified SEIR Framework

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abagna Stephen, Bongo Senior High School, Ghana.

(2) Nathan Oigo Mokaya, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Radael de Souza Parolin, Federal University of Pampa, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Hasan ALRIDHA, Iraq.

(2) Radael de Souza Parolin, Federal University of Pampa, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abagna Stephen, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nathan Oigo Mokaya, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Radael de Souza Parolin, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Niger Cultivars/ Genotypes for Resistance to Leaf Spot Disease Under Natural Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Neena Singla, Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Goutam Mahata, India.

(2) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, India.

(3) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Jose Oliveira Dantas, Instituto Federal de Educacao, Ciencia e Tecnologia de Sergipe, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nikhilesh Baruah, India.

(2) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Goutam Mahata, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jose Oliveira Dantas, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care in Ghana: A Scoping Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kwaku Duah Oppong, University of Texas At Austin, United States of America.

(2) Kofi Gyasi Agyei, University of Rochester, School of Nursing/Garden City University College, U.S.A.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kwaku Duah Oppong, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kofi Gyasi Agyei, U.S.A) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Yield of Rabi Sesame as Influenced by Weed Management Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science (Patliputra University, Patna), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA