Peer Review History: Effect of Super chilling and Freezing on shelf life and quality attributes of improved native chicken varieties and commercial broilers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) CHANDAN KUMAR, BN MANDAL UNIVERSITY MADHEPURA, INDIA.

(2) Pratibha D. Sharma, DRPCAU, India.

(3) Walaa Hussein Khalifa, National Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) VOEMESSE Kokou, Togolese Institute of Agronomic Research, Togo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (CHANDAN KUMAR, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratibha D. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Walaa Hussein Khalifa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Salinity-Mediated Structuring and Marine–Estuarine Connectivity of Penaeid Shrimp Assemblages in Ashtamudi Wetland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mahnaz Gümrükçüoğlu Yiğit, Sakarya University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Arup Kar, Ramnagar College, India.

(2) Malek Hassanpour, Osmania University, India.

(3) Hendra Febriawan, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arup Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malek Hassanpour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hendra Febriawan, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength, Microhardness and Fracture Toughness of a Polymer-infiltrated Ceramic and a Lithium Disilicate Glass Matrix Ceramic: An in vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Chandra, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Sivaraman M, India.

(3) Rafat Sasany, Biruni University, Turkey.

(4) K.P. Srinivasa Perumal, Mahendra Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(5) Utkarsh A. Patil, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pagidi Madhukar, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Utkarsh A. Patil, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sivaraman M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rafat Sasany, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (K.P. Srinivasa Perumal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Utkarsh A. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification Profile of Aortic Endocarditis with Complications of a Coronal-aortic Triangle Abscess in a Stemi Patient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Netherlands.

Reviewers:

(1) Pietro Candela, Casa di Cura Candela – Palermo, Italy.

(2) Amany Shakeir Jaber, Thi-Qar University /College of Science, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rohit Kumar Singh, Patna Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pietro Candela, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amany Shakeir Jaber, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Abundance and Parasitic Contamination of Synanthropic Flies in Selected Waste Dump Sites in Awka Metropolis: A Public Health Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadia Batool, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Alaa hamady obeid Al-Taei, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadia Batool, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alaa hamady obeid Al-Taei, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ingrained Symbols and Hierarchy of Needs: Interpreting Syed Waliullah’s Tree Without Roots through the Lens of Peirce and Maslow

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Teguh Prakoso, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia.

(2) Regan M. Labanta, Ateneo de Naga University, Philippines.

(3) Tarim Masood, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adi Shimoudi Jonathan, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Hisam Ahyani, Institut Miftahul Huda Al Azhar, Indonesia.

(3) Ishan Khan, Chandigarh University, India.

(4) Mohammad Sherfudeen Chagla, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(5) Stephen H. Gobewole, Walden University, United States.

(6) Tetiana STAROSTENKO, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Teguh Prakoso, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Regan M. Labanta, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tarim Masood, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Phenomenological Study of English Teachers’ Firsthand Experiences in Multigrade Classrooms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Thangavel, Thiagarajar College of Preceptors (Aided), India.

(2) Stephanie O. Solanon, Davao Del Sur State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Thangavel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stephanie O. Solanon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-Economic and Personal Profiles of Agriculture Graduates in India: Implications for Professional Pathways

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) David C. Nwogbo, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Sa’adu Hamisu, Federal University of Agriculture Zuru , Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (David C. Nwogbo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sa’adu Hamisu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Renal Function Indices among Overweight and Obese Students at Joseph Ayo Babalola University, Ikeji-Arakeji, Osun State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Putu Austin Widyasari Wijaya, M.Biomed, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.

(2) Azizah B. Hafed, King Saud Bin-AbdulAziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia .

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Mishra, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Lucknow, India.

(2) Habiba Khdair Abdalsada, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Putu Austin Widyasari Wijaya, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azizah B. Hafed, Saudi Arabia ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional characteristics of spaghetti produced from blends of wheat-sorghum-bombax costatum calyces

Editor(s):

(1) Kristina Mastanjević, Associate Professor,J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Binod Kumar Bharti, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology , India.

(2) Tri I. Wirjantoro, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

(3) Celile Aylin Oluk, Eastern Mediterranean Agriculture Research Institute, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elizabeth Thangamani Sunitha, St, Xavier’s College, India.

(2) Eman  Mustafa   EL-sayed, National Research  Centre, Egypt.

(3) Indunil Karunarathna, Teaching Hospital Polonnaruwa, National Nephrology Specialized Hospital Polonnaruwa, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Binod Kumar Bharti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tri I. Wirjantoro, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Celile Aylin Oluk, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA