Peer Review History: Exploring Keratin-Degrading Microbes in Poultry Soil: Isolation, Identification, and Feather Degradation Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ng Zhi Xiang, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nilima Pradeep Tidar, Mumbai University, India.

(2) Himani Sharma, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) R. Nithyatharani, Bharathidasan University, India.

(4) Roseline Akwukwaegbu, Univeristy of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmesh Narotambhai Sherathia, Dr. Subhash University, India.

(2) Jasmina D.Acharya, J.S.Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) Jibril Mohammed, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(4) Krishnagowdu Saravanan, Arignar Anna College (Arts & Science), India.

(5) Tejeswara Rao Voonna, MVR Degree and PG College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nilima Pradeep Tidar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himani Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Nithyatharani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Roseline Akwukwaegbu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Avian Diversity in Bhosari, Haveli Taluka, Pune District, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sorial Adly Moharib, National Research Centre, Egypt,

(2) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Satya Prakash, Radha Govind University, India.

(2) Nikunj B. Gajera, Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology, India.

(3) Hossein Javanbakht, University of Guilan, Iran.

(4) Harsh Vishwakarma, Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IIT Indore), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satya Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nikunj B. Gajera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hossein Javanbakht, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Advances and Applications of Compost in Soil Health and Crop Productivity: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers: 

(1) Raghvendra Kumar Kushwaha, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) ReynaldiLaurenze, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aseel Fadhil Kareem, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Jasin Rahman V K, T.K.M. College of Arts and Science, India.

(3) M. Raveendra Reddy, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raghvendra Kumar Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (ReynaldiLaurenze, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation, Production and Purification of Antimicrobial Peptides from Microbial Species Isolated from Manure and Banana Farm Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayad Mohammed Jebur Al-Mamoori, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Say-YedHesameddinTafreshi, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Research and Production Complex, Iran.

(2) NipunBariya, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University Surat, India.

(3) Suchitra Panigrahy, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Say-YedHesameddinTafreshi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (NipunBariya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suchitra Panigrahy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicides for Controlling Henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L.) in the Upper Coastal Area of Texas

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhab Kumar Datta, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Abhinash Moirangthem, Central Agricultural University, Iroisemba, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83*/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhab Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abhinash Moirangthem, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of Marketing Constraints Affecting Women Handloom Weavers in Yadadri Bhuvangiri District Using the Garrett Ranking Technique

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, and Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Nirmalkumar, Alagappa University, India.

(2) Prashant Kalshetti, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amir Hussain, University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, India.

(2) Krishna Das, Gauhati University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Nirmalkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Kalshetti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma in a Middle-aged Man: A Rare Occurrence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Snehal Singh, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Eduardo Fernandes Marques, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shruti Bhatnagar, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Snehal Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eduardo Fernandes Marques, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Coracohumeral Ligament Stretching on Pain, Performance and External Rotation of Shoulder in Patient`s with Adhesive Capsulitis Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sathish Kumar C., Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, India.

(2) V.V.Manjula Kumari , Varanaa’s Healthcare Research and Training , India.

(3) Gaurav Bhatnagar, Maharashtra Institute of Physiotherapy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ekisha Gaba, RoyaL Free London Nhs Trust, United Kingdom.

(2) Hakimeh Adigozali, Tabriz university of medical sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sathish Kumar C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V.V.Manjula Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gaurav Bhatnagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Thalidomide in SLE with Skin Damage Refractory to Other Treatment Options: Two Case Reports

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mateus M. Bergamaschi, Universidade de Araraquara, Brazil.

(2) Divya Yadav, RUHS, India.

(3) Mostaque Mahmud, Bangladesh Medical University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Gupta, Government Dental College & Hospital Srinagar, India.

(2) Khin Phyu Pyar, Defense Services Medical Academy, Myanmar.

(3) Luis Alcides Brandini De Boni, Brazil.

(4) Neel Navinkumar Patel, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA.

(5) Paras Sharmam, India.

(6) Prashant Bhimrao Khartade, DMIHER, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mateus M. Bergamaschi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mostaque Mahmud, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Soil Nitrogen Resistome: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Proliferation of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) E. D. Sachintha, Wayamba University, Sri Lanka.

(2) N.K. Udaya Prakash, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haralakal Keerthi Kumari, KLE college of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Srinivasa Rao Meesala, India.

(3) Tanya Sachan, Autonomous State Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. D. Sachintha, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.K. Udaya Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA