Peer Review History: Surgical Outcomes and Complications Following Silicone Oil Removal in Retinal Detachment Surgery at KCMC Eye Department, Northern Tanzania (2020-2023)

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Chaudhry, India.

(2) Anannya Bose, Barasat Bidhan Chandra Roy Institute Of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Ivelina Pitakova, Private Eye Clinic Varna, Bulgaria.

(4) Nikol Panou, General Oncologic Hospital of Kifisia “Oi Agioi Anargyroi”, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tayo Julius Bogunjoko, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anannya Bose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ivelina Pitakova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nikol Panou, Greece) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change and Determinants Influencing Adaptive Readiness in Chhattisgarh State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Flomo L. Gbawoquiya, Cuttington University, Liberia.

(2) Asad Ali Khan, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flomo L. Gbawoquiya, Liberia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asad Ali Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Thermodynamic and Structural Insights into Se–Te–Sn–In Chalcogenide Glasses Using Specific Heat Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National University of Colombia, Colombia.

(2) Dr. Madogni Vianou Irenee, UAC, 01 BP 526 Cotonou, Universite d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Benin.

Reviewers:

(1) Nitiraj V. Kulkarni, Vishwakarma University, India.

(2) Oke Temidayo Joseph, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, United States of America.

(3) G. Phaneendra Reddy, Dr. YSR Architecture and Fine Arts University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sri Lakshmi, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Toderas Mihaela, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nitiraj V. Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oke Temidayo Joseph, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G. Phaneendra Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Towards Decarbonized Rural Electrification: Viability of a Renewable Hybrid Microgrid in Ibiaku Ikot Oku, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University. Alexandria. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, University of Douala, Cameroon.

(2) Karimulla Syed Mohammad, University of Technology and Applied Sciences-Shinas, Sultanate of Oman.

(3) Eneckdem Tsopgni Vadel, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eko Sasmito Hadi, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) V.Saravanan, Arunai Engineering College(Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karimulla Syed Mohammad, Sultanate of Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eneckdem Tsopgni Vadel, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Co-Pyrolysis and Catalytic Cracking of Coconut Shell Oil with Vacuum Gas Oil: Production and FTIR/GC–MS Characterization of Bio-fuel

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chukwuma John Ijeli, Federal University of Technology Owerri (Futo), Nigeria.

(2) Mohammad Siddique, BUITEMS, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Thipsuree Kornboonraksa, Burapha University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chukwuma John Ijeli, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Subhash Palekar Natural Farming (SPNF) in Sericulture: A Regenerative Approach to Strengthen the Soil–Mulberry–Silkworm Continuum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Dhakal, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Nepal.

(2) Ratan Lal Solanki, MPUAT, India.

(3) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar, Droan College of Education & Technology, Kumaun University, India.

(2) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Anvarovich, Scientific Research Institute Of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

(3) Mohammad Halim Khan, Atarra Post Graduate College Atarra, Bundelkhand University, India.

(4) Mrinal Choudhury, SCSCA, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Dhakal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ratan Lal Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of ARIMA and ARIMA–ANN Hybrid Models for Forecasting Groundnut Area, Production and Productivity in Surguja District, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Udaya Kumar Addanki, Anurag University, India.

(2) Sachin S Chinchorkar, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nnah Bright Ahuraezemma, Abia State University, Nigeria.

(2) S.Pushpa, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udaya Kumar Addanki, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sachin S Chinchorkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnoentomological Assessment of Public Knowledge and Consumption Practices of Cybister tripunctatus in Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maan AbdulAzeez Shafeeq Al-Salihi, Mustansiriya University, Iraq.

(2) Dharna Tembhare Bisen, College Of Agriculture , India.

(3) Slamet Mardiyanto Rahayu,, Universitas Islam Al-Azhar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maan AbdulAzeez Shafeeq Al-Salihi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dharna Tembhare Bisen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Slamet Mardiyanto Rahayu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidative Capacity of L-Ascorbic Acid and Quercetin on Sperm Functional Integrity during Cryopreservation of Gir Bull Semen under Semi-Arid Conditions of Rajasthan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hani Nasser Hermiz, University of Salahaddin, Iraq.

(2) Ahmed Fathy Hassan Seioudy, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hani Nasser Hermiz, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Fathy Hassan Seioudy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Potential of Coconut Biomass Waste as a Growing Medium

Editor(s):

(1) Asist. Prof. Hakan Sevik, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Subham Kandwal, University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Deepak Maurya, GD Goenka University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subham Kandwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA