Peer Review History: Comparative Effects of Sprouting and Fermentation on the Nutrient and Anti-nutrient Composition of Soybeans (Glycine max)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vijai K. Agnihotri, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Surabhi Shukla, India.

(2) Uttiya Jana, J.D.Birla Institute, Jadavpur University, India.

(3) Joseph Odolomarun Akuirene, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joseph OdoLOmarun Akuirene, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) Neeti Lakhani, ICAR – Research Complex for Eastern Region, India.

(3) Shilpi Sharma, School of Allied Health Sciences, Jaipur National University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surabhi Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Uttiya Jana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Joseph Odolomarun Akuirene, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Agronomic Practices on Growth, Yield, and Profitability of King Chilli (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) in Darrang District of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadir Ali Bhangar Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Hillary Otieno Owuor, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(3) Muhammad Zulkiffal, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jacinta Obianuju Onovo, University of Hull, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadir Ali Bhangar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hillary Otieno Owuor, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Zulkiffal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1| File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Assessment of Fungicides against Macrophomina phaseolina Causing Charcoal Rot in Soybean

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhav Pratap Singh, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(2) Hanan Arief Hasan, Jerash University, Jordan.

(3) Seethiya Mahajan, Khalsa University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Lokesh Ramachandran, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaibhav Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanan Arief Hasan, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seethiya Mahajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variation in Litter Dynamics under Forests and Agroforestry Systems of the Tropics: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sairaj Krishnapillai , Nesamony Memorial Christian College, India.

(2) Shohreh Kazemi, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sairaj Krishnapillai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shohreh Kazemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Auxin Treatments and Seasonal Variation on Stem Cuttings Propagation of Hildegardia populifolia (DC.) Schott & Endl.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna,V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, CSIR-Forestry Research Institut, Ghana.

(2) Krishnkumar Pravinbhai Donda, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed M. Eed, Ibb University, Yemen.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishnkumar Pravinbhai Donda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of MicroRNA in Prostate Cancer: A Review Based on Nigerian Population

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ferdous Bin Ali, Bangladesh.

(2) Raushan Kumar, University of Allahabad, India.

(3) Amber Khalid, Alshifa Institute of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(4) Gunasekar Manoharan, New Jersey Bio Science Centre, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gholamreza Mesbah, Ardakan University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ferdous Bin Ali, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raushan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amber Khalid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modelling Surface Runoff for Kal River Basin with SCS-CN Method in a GIS Environment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinothini C, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Ayuk Valery, University of Buea, Buea South-West Region, Cameroon.

(3) Laishram Sunil Singh, Waikhom Mani Girls` College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilham Ilahi, University of Riau, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinothini C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayuk Valery, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laishram Sunil Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical and Pharmacological Profile of Cissampelos pareira Linn.: A Multi Targeted Therapeutic Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu,  Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers: 

(1) Adarsh Kumar Pathak, ASPC, India.

(2) R.L.Manisha, India.

(3) Himanshu Singh, Babu Sunder Singh College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Kevin Francis, Texas A&M University Kingsville, USA.

(5) Huda Jasim M. Altameme, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lahai Koroma, Eastern Technical University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone.

(2) Mhd Azhar Ibrahim Kharsa, United Kingdom.

(3) Muath Jabbar Tarfa, University of Samarra, Iraq.

(4) Pankaj H. Chaudhary, P. R. Pote Patil College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) P Umar Farooq Baba, SKIMS, India.

(6) Ugwu Valentine Ifebuchechukwu, State University of Medical and Applied Sciences, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adarsh Kumar Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.L.Manisha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Himanshu Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kevin Francis, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Huda Jasim M. Altameme, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Dietary Patterns and Hunting Strategies of the Indian Panthers (Panthera pardus fusca) in the Aravalli Hills of Southern Rajasthan: A Long-term Scatological Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Inci, Bingol University, Bingol, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) HERONIMA D. SANCHEZ, BENGUET STATE UNIVERSITY, BOKOD CAMPUS, PHILIPPINES.

(2) ERHAN ÜNLÜ, DICLE UNIVERSITY, TURKEY.

(3) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Laikipia University, Kenya.

(4) Biswadeep Jena, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (O.U.A.T.), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Zohaib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad (38000), Pakistan.

(2) Praveen kumar yadaw, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Roozbeh Fallahi, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (HERONIMA D. SANCHEZ, PHILIPPINES) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (ERHAN ÜNLÜ, TURKEY) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Biswadeep Jena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solar-powered Groundnut Decorticator: Design, Performance and Emission Reductions for Sustainable Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev Kumar, Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University, India.

(2) Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Wollega University Shambu Campus, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jeykumar R K Cm, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Affiliated to Anna University, India.

(2) Vishal Pramod Kushe, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University Maharashtra, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA