Peer Review History: Seas of Success: Unveiling the Economic Dynamics of India’s Marine Product Exports

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco BPM, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Joya, Kiel University, Germany.

(2) Abu Zafar Mahmudul Haq, Trust University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) André Pedral Sampaio de Sena, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil.

(2) Bharath Samishetti, Balaji Institute of Management Sciences, India.

(3) Manisha Singodia, RAJUVAS, India.

(4) Rudy Hartono, Makassar of Health Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(5) Sheren fadhal abbas, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Joya, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Zafar Mahmudul Haq, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change to ACRI from JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ultrasonic for Reducing Tetracycline Residues in Acacia Honey and Its Impact on Physicochemical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sameh Awad, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Bukya, Symbiosis Skills and Professional University, India.

(2) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Gharahdaghigharahtappeh, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Iran.

(2) Jintana Wiboonsirikul, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(3) Shweta Patel, Galgotias University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Bukya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatio-Temporal Soil Quality Dynamics of Ashtamudi: A Tropical Ramsar Wetland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratik Sitaram Matkar, Yashoda Technical Campus, Satara, India.

(2) Shyamal Borah, Cotton University, India.

(3) Avdesh Bhardawaj, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Noureldeen, Egypt.

(2) Raphael Kwakye Amaning, University of Energy And Natural Resources, Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pratik Sitaram Matkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shyamal Borah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Avdesh Bhardawaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Deep LSTM Architectures with Multi-Head Attention for Enhanced IoT Intrusion Detection: A Memory-Efficient Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University. Alexandria. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anmol Adhikari, IIMS College, Nepal.

(2) Kavita Uttam Rahane, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imreena Ali, ISL Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anmol Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kavita Uttam Rahane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Deciphering Host Preference and Resistance of Basmati Rice Varieties against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University., Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) BABATUNDE, Samuel Femi, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(2) Mahreen Hanif, MNS University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (BABATUNDE, Samuel Femi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahreen Hanif, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Effect of Stocking Density on the Growth Performance of Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcellus): An Experimental Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers: 

(1) A. Anand Kumar, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(2) Bagyalakshmi Jarsangi, NTR College of Veterinary Sciences, India.

(3) Daniel Cocan, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Anand Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bagyalakshmi Jarsangi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Daniel Cocan, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Histopathological alterations in the liver of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings fed a diet supplemented with Agaricus bisporus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aman Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

(2) Nur Amiera Kamarudin, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Sangeeta Sinha, MES’s, Nowrosjee Wadia College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aman Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nur Amiera Kamarudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sangeeta Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Soil Biological Properties under Forest and Agroforestry Land Uses

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mutari Abubakari, CSIR – SARI stationed in Nyankpala, Ghana.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim A. Raji, West Virginia University, USA.

(2) Yehia Galal M. Galal, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

(3) Hamid Hammood Mhawesh, College of Agriculture and Marshes, University of Thi Qar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bijay K. Mohanty, Khallikote University, India.

(2) Husam Mohammed Muhi, Diyala University, Iraq.

(3) Nikhilesh Baruah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Ranjita Bezbaruah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim A. Raji, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yehia Galal M. Galal, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hamid Hammood Mhawesh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Solanaceous Rootstocks on Bacterial Wilt Resistance, Growth and Productivity of Sweet Pepper

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mutari Abubakari, CSIR – SARI stationed in Nyankpala, Ghana.

Reviewers:

(1) Maruti Ambiger, Government Science College, India.

(2) Huda Jasim M. Altameme, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(3) Sibte Sayyeda, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pushpa Kumari, BAU Sabour, India.

(2) Tharringwon Marchang Ningshen, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Science, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maruti Ambiger, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Jasim M. Altameme, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sibte Sayyeda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Edutainment Revolution: Designing Ethical, Adaptive and Immersive Technology for the Next Generation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar T D, DHSGSU, India.

(2) Jaypee R. Lopres, Gallup McKinley County Schools, U.S.A.

(3) Ma. Chona S. Rizada, Palawan State University, Philippines.

(4) Ugbede Abdul, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mounira Ben Sidhom, University of Monastir, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praveen Kumar T D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaypee R. Lopres, U.S.A) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ma. Chona S. Rizada, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ugbede Abdul, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA