Peer Review History: Development and Validation of an ADR Awareness and Reporting Questionnaire for Pharmacovigilance in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R.Deveswaran, Faculty of Pharmacy M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nasim Ilyas , SMDAS, PAF-IAST, Pakistan.

(2) VIJAY M. KATEKHAYE, DR. RAJENDRA GODE MEDICAL COLLEGE, INDIA.

(3) Ramya Rachamanti, Guntur Medical College, India.

(4) Suhena Sarkar, Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nasim Ilyas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (VIJAY M. KATEKHAYE, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ramya Rachamanti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Suhena Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bacterial Etiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Urinary Tract Infections in Sana’a, Yemen

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Amad Abdelkarim El-Marghani, University of Zintan, Libya.

(2) Conny Riana Tjampakasari, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepan. G, Icmr- National Institute of Epidemiology, India.

(2) Fatima Moeen Abbas, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(3) Nandita Pal, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta, India.

(4) Saba Hameed Majeed, AL-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amad Abdelkarim El-Marghani, Libya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dra. Conny Riana Tjampakasari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Computational Design and Molecular Docking Study of Structurally Modified Gallic Acid Derivatives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Prajapati , Krishna Institute of Pharmacy and Sciences, India.

(2) Balakrishna Vuyyala, Guru Nanak Institutions Technical Campus, India.

(3) Mukesh Kumar Shukla, Hygia Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Reema Jaiswal, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olorunfemi Ayeotan, Temple University- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Balakrishna Vuyyala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mukesh Kumar Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Reema Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spectroscopic and Time Domain Reflectometry Studies of Protein in 1, 2-Dihydroxyethane Solution

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Padma Prasad, JSS College of Arts, Commerce and Science, India.

(2) Ammar Nadal Shareef, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manisha r.  Chikane, Jawaharlal Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Ravika Vijay, S. S. Jain subodh p. G. College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Padma Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ammar Nadal Shareef, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Spatiotemporal Variations of Turbidity Flow in Lake Pontchartrain Using Remote Sensing (NDTI Method)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Bharani Baanu, Ramco Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Mohammed Khlaif Challab Alhamd, Iraq.

(3) Hamza Ait Zamzami, Hassan Ii University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Bharani Baanu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Khlaif Challab Alhamd, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hamza Ait Zamzami, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Status of Water Quality of Naikal Pond in Northeastern Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom.

(2) N.Muthulakshmi Andal, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar Singh, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sodiq Alaka, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.Muthulakshmi Andal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Renewable Energy in Shaping the Upcoming Energy Demands in India: A Review on Status, Policy Analysis and Future Pathways

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Teresa Lopez-Lara, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed ElHamahmy, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Kelvin Bassey, University of Hull, United State of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abu Ridwan Pavel, International Islamic University Chittagong (IIUC), Bangladesh.

(2) Esha Yadav, Brahmanand P. G. College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed ElHamahmy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kelvin Bassey, United State of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bridging Digital Skills Gap: Perspectives from Higher Education and Employers in Business and Health Sectors

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shepherd Shoko, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Philangenkosi Zibonele Gcwensa, University of Zululand, South Africa.

(3) Addikarige Nalinda Nuwan, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elaochi Isaac, Kogi State College of Education (Technical), Nigeria.

(2) M.DInesh Kumar, Mannar Thirumalai Naicker College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shepherd Shoko, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Philangenkosi Zibonele Gcwensa, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Addikarige Nalinda Nuwan, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Mechanical Properties and Bonding Behavior of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Structures

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Ekrem Bektasevic, University Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(2) Tasmin Shahi Arzoo, East West University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shaimaa Muthana Abdulrahman, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ekrem Bektasevic, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tasmin Shahi Arzoo, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: An Analysis of Protocols and Clinical Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Francesca Rolli, University of Parma, Italy.

(2) Paras Wani, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jagadeeswari.J, Saveetha College of Nursing, India.

(2) Priya Nair, Shifa Al Jazeera medical centre, United Arab Emirates.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francesca Rolli, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paras Wani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA