Peer Review History: Additive Manufacturing in Food Systems: A Comprehensive Review of 3D-Printed Meat Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Bukya, Symbiosis Skills and Professional University, India.

(2) Oboyi Matthew Echeofun, Taraba State University, Nigeria.

(3) Ifeoluwa PELE, Federal University of Health Sciences, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Bukya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oboyi Matthew Echeofun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ifeoluwa PELE, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Impact of Urban Solid Waste Management on the Ground of a Landfill: A Case of the Bonoua Landfill, Ivory Coast

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal S. Gaballa, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Etefia, Titus Edet, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anuradha Reddy, Sridevi Women’s Engineering College, India.

(2) Bincy Benny, Nishad College of Nursing and Allied Sciences, India.

(3) E.Sujatha, Saveetha Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(4) Prerna Mehta, GD Rungta College of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murugaragavan Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Etefia, Titus Edet, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic and Sustainability Assessment of Compressed Earth Bricks in Construction: Evidence from Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Elias Susi Degefa, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

(2) Veeranuch Srakaew, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.P. Srinivasa Perumal, Mahendra Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Modugu Naveen Kumar, Chaitanya Deemed To Be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elias Susi Degefa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veeranuch Srakaew, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: NATURE AND STRUCTURE OF RURAL YOUTH EMPLOYMENT IN PUNJAB

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Nuhu Mukhtar Nuhu, Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso College of Advanced and Remedial Studies, Nigeria.

(2) Kavitha S R, Dr. NSAM FGC (NITTE Deemed to be University Bengaluru), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kana Safrina Rouzi, Universitas Alma Ata, Indonesia.

(2) Rahul Patil, NICDR-SPPU, India.

(3) Saba Inamdar, Presidency University, India.

(4) S.S.Jeyaraj, Sino-British College (Partnership program with Staffordshire University, UK) Guangxi Minzu University, P.R.China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nuhu Mukhtar Nuhu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kavitha S R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Descriptive Analysis of Five-Year Strategic Legume Production Dynamics in Turkey (2020-2024): Trends in Area, Yield, and Production for Dry Beans and Vetch

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Miguel Armando López Beltrán, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, México.

(2) Prasannakumar J K, Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) E.Raveendra Reddy, K L University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atul R. Bendale, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) S.Sreedevi, Bharathi Women’s College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Miguel Armando López Beltrán, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasannakumar J K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (E.Raveendra Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Genus Grewia as a Source of Bioactive Natural Products: Phytochemistry and Therapeutic Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) H. Sirajunisha, Bishop Heber College, India.

(2) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(3) Tejinder Kaur, UIPS, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Ushaswi, GITAM (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Gajanan Dongare, Shri Shivaji Science and Arts College, India.

(3) Kakad Subhash L., Pravara Rural Education Society‟s Padmashri Vikhe Patil College, Affiliated SPPU, India.

(4) Mohammed Khakaf Mohammed, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(5) Susmita Chakrabarty, Driems University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (H. Sirajunisha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tejinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil-Site Suitability Evaluation for Oil Palm in the Soils of Khammam and Bhadradri Kothagudem Districts of Telangana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho (Retd.), State University of New York, New Paltz, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Alinezhad, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Venkatesan V G, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ruby Saha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Essam Samir Soliman, King Salman International University & Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(3) Faith Ehinomhen Itohanmwen, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(4) Moges Tadesse Gedamu, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

(5) Sourav Mullick, The Neotia University, India.

(6) Suphathida Aumtong, Maejo University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Alinezhad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venkatesan V G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ruby Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: CHARACTERIZATION OF COB RIND BIOCHAR AND ITS EFFECT ON PRIMARY NUTRIENT CONTENT AND THEIR UPTAKE BY FINGER MILLET (ELEUSINE CORACANA).

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kosev Valentin, Institute of Forage Crops, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Diane Aparecida Ostroski, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Brazil.

(2) Aashu Rajput, Uttaranchal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divya U.K., Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Enrique Wulff, IMF-CSIC, Spain.

(3) Gitam Singh, Madhav University, India.

(4) Medani P. Bhandari, Akamai University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Diane Aparecida Ostroski, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aashu Rajput, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association between Visual Function Impairment and Road Traffic Accident Risk among Commercial Vehicle Drivers in Gwagwalada, Abuja

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Chaudhry, Bioclinitech Technologies Pvt Ltd Mumbai, India.

(2) Sadiq Hassan Yahya Khoreem, Al-Razi University, Yemen.

(3) Ankit Varshney, Shree Bharatimaiya College of Optometry and Physiotherapy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ezinne C. Nkeremuzor, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Carlo artemi, Italy.

(3) Cristina Stanescu, ”Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Romania.

(4) Lakshmi kuniyal, Aarogyam health clinic, India.

(5) Nguyen Tien Dung, Thang Long University, Vietnam.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadiq Hassan Yahya Khoreem, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ankit Varshney, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Change in the Socio-economic Status of Farmers through the Use of Agricultural Machinery

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Samadhan Surwase, Vasantdada Sugar Institute, India.

(2) Vipin Tanwar, SKUAST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Achoja Roland Onomu, Formerly in University of Fort Hare but currently at Delta State University, Nigeria.

(2) Mukti Nath Jha, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samadhan Surwase, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vipin Tanwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA