Peer Review History: Eco-Friendly Synthesis and Adsorptive Performance of ZnO/CuO and MnO/CuO Bimetallic Nanoparticles for Heavy Metal Removal from Aqueous Solutions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sehar Gul, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Mohammed Khlaif Challab Alhamd, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sehar Gul, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Khlaif Challab Alhamd, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Management Practices and Entrepreneurial Orientation among Medium Scale Enterprises in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis I. Ogosi, Western Delta University, Nigeria.

(2) Sujata Das, United School of Business Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis I. Ogosi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sujata Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report of an Abdominal Wall Desmoid Tumor Treated by Dual-Mesh Reconstruction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yasushi Shibata, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sergiy Karachentsev, Italy.

(2) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad College of Nursing, Iraq.

(3) Sorin Paun, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sergiy Karachentsev, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haider Mohammed Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sorin Paun, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sulphur Cycling Microbiomes: Biogeochemical Transformations, Stress Resilience and Next Generation Tools for Improving Oilseed Crop Yield and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Poletto, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan.

(2) R VijayKumar, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suleman Haider Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Vijay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study on Substrate Optimisation, Nutritional and Bioactive Screening of P. sajor-caju – Embedded in Gummies Production

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramalingappa.B, Davangere University, India.

(2) S. Murugessan, National Institute of Siddha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A Vasanthakumari MDS, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(3) Guillermo Bracamonte, National University of Cordoba (UNC), Argentine.

(4) Hem Prakash Verma, ICAR-National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, India.

(5) Ibrahim Alrabayah, Cairo University, Egypt.

(6) Krishna Chaitanya Tirunagaru, SVKM’s College of Agriculture, India.

(7) Mujeeb Ur Rahman, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramalingappa.B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Murugessan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Supply-chain and Logistics Constraints as Determinants of Agricultural Risk and Insurance Uptake among Nigerian Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Larissa-Margareta Batrancea, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Grishma Bhavsar, GLS University, India.

(2) Le Trung Hieu, Tra Vinh University, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupama Sundar D, JSS Science and Technology University, India.

(2) Micheal Effiong Udoboho, ABU Zaria, Nigeria.

(3) Pradeep B Mane, AISSMS Institute of Information Technology, India.

(4) Pankaj Kumar Singh, North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Homeopathy (NEIAH), India.

(5) Vishalkumar R. Gor, Government Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Grishma Bhavsar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Le Trung Hieu, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Seismic Design Methods for High-strength Concrete Shear Wall Structures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Figen Balo, Firat University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Kumar, College of Military Engineering, Pune, India.

(2) Hamdy Elgohary, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamdy Elgohary, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design, Implementation and Didactic Applications of an Online Biostatistical Assistant for Higher Education Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

(3) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Tapan R Mohanty, National Law Institute University, India.

(2) Hina Munir, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Sagar Bishwakarma, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(4) Weixing Hu, Bohai University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Indrajit Sahoo, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Rashmi Singhai, Regional Institute of Education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tapan R Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hina Munir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sagar Bishwakarma, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Weixing Hu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Pre-sowing Treatments to Break Dormancy in Senna (Cassia angustifolia Vahl.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Khaiper, Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, India.

(2) G.Bhagirath, Government Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manish Kumar Vijay, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research institute, India.

(2) Pradeep Kumar, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute Jhansi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mamta Khaiper, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.Bhagirath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Composition and in vitro Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Leaf Extract of Psidium guajava against Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruchika Khari, Sneh TT College, India.

(2) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, India.

(3) S. Vijayalakshmi, Sri Sarada College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Umer Sohaib, Superior University, Pakistan.

(2) Bibin Baby Augustine, USA.

(3) Indranil Chatterjee, Birbhum Pharmacy School (MAKAUT), India.

(4) Umesh Kumar, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.73/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruchika Khari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA