Peer Review History: Physiological and Agronomic Response of Sesame [Sesamum indicum (L.)] to Temporary Water Deficit

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Binayak Chakraborty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Reviewers:

(1) G C Bora, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AnghamTalal Mahmoud AL Chalabi, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Saurabh Singh, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G C Bora, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dwi Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microplastics in the Environment: Uptake, Bioaccumulation and Impacts on Plants, Animals and Humans Health: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Aleena Nazir, Bahria University Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Shiv Shankar Yadav, BBD University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashraf Saddik Alias, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aleena Nazir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiv Shankar Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Cladding Material and Air Cavity on Ventilated Facades in Warm Semi-Arid Climates

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chien-Jen Wang, National University of Tainan, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Eyvazi, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran.

(2) Abdelmoutalib Benfrid, University of Djillali, Algeria.

(3) Sankov Petro, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) José Gabriel Lopes, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa – Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Sourav Debnath, Brainware University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Eyvazi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdelmoutalib Benfrid, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sankov Petro, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mitigating Maternal Risks from Environmental Contaminants: Feasibility and Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof David Coman, The Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Australia.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

(2) R. Vijayalakshmi, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(3) Rashmi Pujar, All India Institute Of Ayurveda, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andromahi Naumovska, UKIM Skopje, N. Macedonia.

(2) Aruni Gallage, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(3) Dian Pratiwi, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Manado, Indonesia.

(4) Jimoh Mohammed Ibrahim, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(5) Krupa Shah, Kasturba Medical college, India.

(6) Nasrin Fazel, Sabzevar medical university sabzevar, Iran.

(7) Olatunji Ogunnubi, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

(8) Samarendra Nath Banerjee, Rammohan College, India.

(9) Shaik Faizan Ali, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rashmi Pujar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Assessment of Bioactivities of Seagrass and its Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R.Deveswaran, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramalingappa, Davangere University, India.

(2) Palvi Sharma, Abhilashi College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) K. Tharini, Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramalingappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Palvi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. Tharini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants used against sexually transmitted infections in the Korhogo department, northern Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Rabita, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Quratulann Sattar, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Veeren Dewoolkar, Analytical Research & Development, USA.

(4) Jasmina D. Acharya, JS Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sambit Kumar Parida, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Rajasthan, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Rabita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quratulann Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Veeren Dewoolkar, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jasmina D. Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Identification of Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from Carrion Using COI Gene Barcoding

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Maite Gil Arriortua, UPV/EHU, Spain.

(2) Anulin Christudhas, Madras Christian College, India.

(3) Bertin Mikolo, Marien Ngouabi University, Republic of the Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maite Gil Arriortua, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anulin Christudhas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bertin Mikolo, Republic of the Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Diagnosis of Macrophomina phaseolina, the Causal Agent of Charcoal Rot Disease in Cluster Bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub] and a Study of its Pathogenicity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanket Sanjay Shinde, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Huda Hazim AL-Taae, Mosul University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanket Sanjay Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Hazim AL-Taae, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Varietal Screening of Pea against Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Homoptera: Aphididae) under Manipur Valley Conditions.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Pratik J. Davaria, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Robert, University of Orleasn, France.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratik J. Davaria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of shoot pruning and paclobutrazol on incidence of sooty mould of mango cultivars

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Singh, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Jasmine, GKSM Government College, Tanda Urmar (Hoshiarpur), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zaid Khaleel Kadhim, Agriculture of college, University of Karbala, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmine, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA