Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chien-Jen Wang, National University of Tainan, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Eyvazi, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran.

(2) Abdelmoutalib Benfrid, University of Djillali, Algeria.

(3) Sankov Petro, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) José Gabriel Lopes, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa – Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Sourav Debnath, Brainware University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Eyvazi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdelmoutalib Benfrid, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sankov Petro, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof David Coman, The Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Australia.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

(2) R. Vijayalakshmi, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(3) Rashmi Pujar, All India Institute Of Ayurveda, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andromahi Naumovska, UKIM Skopje, N. Macedonia.

(2) Aruni Gallage, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(3) Dian Pratiwi, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Manado, Indonesia.

(4) Jimoh Mohammed Ibrahim, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(5) Krupa Shah, Kasturba Medical college, India.

(6) Nasrin Fazel, Sabzevar medical university sabzevar, Iran.

(7) Olatunji Ogunnubi, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

(8) Samarendra Nath Banerjee, Rammohan College, India.

(9) Shaik Faizan Ali, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rashmi Pujar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R.Deveswaran, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramalingappa, Davangere University, India.

(2) Palvi Sharma, Abhilashi College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) K. Tharini, Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramalingappa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Palvi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. Tharini, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Rabita, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Quratulann Sattar, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Veeren Dewoolkar, Analytical Research & Development, USA.

(4) Jasmina D. Acharya, JS Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sambit Kumar Parida, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Rajasthan, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Rabita, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quratulann Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Veeren Dewoolkar, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jasmina D. Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Maite Gil Arriortua, UPV/EHU, Spain.

(2) Anulin Christudhas, Madras Christian College, India.

(3) Bertin Mikolo, Marien Ngouabi University, Republic of the Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maite Gil Arriortua, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anulin Christudhas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bertin Mikolo, Republic of the Congo) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanket Sanjay Shinde, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Huda Hazim AL-Taae, Mosul University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanket Sanjay Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Hazim AL-Taae, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Pratik J. Davaria, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Robert, University of Orleasn, France.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratik J. Davaria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Singh, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Jasmine, GKSM Government College, Tanda Urmar (Hoshiarpur), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zaid Khaleel Kadhim, Agriculture of college, University of Karbala, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmine, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra Singh Rawat, DBS Global University, India.

(2) Ibraheem Mohammed Aliyas, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Leomar da Silva de Lima, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Brasil.

(2) Rahal Elkahkahi, University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravindra Singh Rawat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibraheem Mohammed Aliyas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Khaled F. M. Salem, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia & University of Sadat City, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Haikal Rahman, State University of Medan, Indonesia.

(2) Waseem Ahmed Khattak, Quaid-I-Azam University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gopala Bhua, CDOE, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Mgbeahuru, chibuihem .i, Nigeria.

(3) Radoslaw J. Walkowiak, Poland.

(4) Ranjit Sambhaji Patil, D Y Patil Agriculture & Technical University, India.

(5) Yitbarek Kiros Weldegerima, JigJiga University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haikal Rahman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waseem Ahmed Khattak, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA