Peer Review History: Efficacy of Plant Extracts in Extending the Postharvest Life of Banana

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egyptc.

(2) Dr. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanaa Abed Hammood Al-Dulaimi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Dian Triadiawarman, Kutai Timur Agricultural College, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ninoska M. Paz Palacios, Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela, República Bolivariana de Venezuela.

(2) Ranapratap Anaji Raut, Dr. BSKKV, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanaa Abed Hammood Al-Dulaimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dian Triadiawarman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on the Concept and Utilization of Sequence Stratigraphy in the Niger Delta

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Archana L. Mahakalkar, Govt. Forensic science Institute, Nagpur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalramengi Fanai, Mizoram University, India.

(2) Khor Wei Chung, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) linda satour, Université d’Oran, Algérie.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalramengi Fanai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khor Wei Chung, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of sustainable soilless growing media for optimizing growth in potted Syngonium

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalit Sadashivrao Khapare, Dr.B.S.Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Shadia M. Abdel-Aziz , Biotechnology Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalit Sadashivrao Khapare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shadia M. Abdel-Aziz, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioremediation Potential of Bacteria Isolated from Dumpsites in Keffi Metropolis, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukund Chandra Thakur, Sardar Patel Institute of Applied Science, India.

(2) Dipansu Sahu, Shree Naranjibhai Lalbhai Patel College Of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhagat Singh, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Nanje Mosere Felicia, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon.

(3) Zeinab Hosseini, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukund Chandra Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dipansu Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Characterization of Fasciola spp. among Slaughtered Cattle in Gombe Central Abattoir, Gombe State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Naji Gimba , Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University , Nigeria.

(2) Ravi Shankar Kumar Mandal, Bihar Animal Sciences University , India.

(3) Anil Singh , Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ofori Samuel, Akenten Appiah Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Ghana.

(2) Saroj  Kumar Yadav, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Naji Gimba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravi Shankar Kumar Mandal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anil Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioefficacy of Fluoxapiprolin (30 G/L) and Fluopicolide (200 G/L) SC on Cucumber Downy Mildew

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nawar Jasim Alsalih, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, University of Ebolowa, Cameroon.

(3) Duygu Mermer Dogu, National Botanic Garden of Turkiye, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debatri Banerjee, St Xavier’s University, India.

(2) D.Ganesh, Mohan Babu University, India.

(4) M. E. Hassan, India.

(5) Mohd Harridon Bin Mohamed Suffian, Universiti Kuala Lumpur Business School, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Duygu Mermer Dogu, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Kachi Ghani Cold-Press Technology for Linseed Oil: Yield, Quality and Cost Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Annabelle C. Flores, Philippines.

(2) Ganesh Santosh Kahar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India.

(2) Pravin Sankhwar, India.

(3) TIŢA Mihaela Adriana, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

(4) Umanu Ochoma , Rivers State College of Nursing Sciences, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Annabelle C. Flores, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh Santosh Kahar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Nano Urea Treatments on Growth and Yield of Single Cut Fodder Oat (Avena sativa L.) under Rabi Season

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Puspita Palupi, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia.

(2) Pradip Kumar, C.C.S. University, India.

(3) Mohammed Dhary Yousif, Al- Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nurul Puspita Palupi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Dhary Yousif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Use of Phosphorus Biofertilizers and Fertilizers for Improving Soybean Productivity and Soil Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Debora DellaoctoMelatiAmbarita, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia.

(2) Moses Mutetwa, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emilkamayana, Ministry of Manpower Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Gagan Singh Guru, Government Digvijay Autonomous Postgraduate College, India.

(3) Khalid Ul Islam Rather, SKUAST-J, J&K, India.

(4) Mohammad Norouzzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debora DellaoctoMelatiAmbarita, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moses Mutetwa, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Multi-Factor Drivers of Land Surface Temperature in Andhra Pradesh, India (2020-2024): Integrating MODIS-Derived Indices, Urban Heat Islands, Hotspot Analysis and Trend Detection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anitha V, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Marcelo Antonio Nero, University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mostefa Abiyat, University of Isfahan, Iran.

(2) Nora Andrea Merino, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anitha V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marcelo Antonio Nero, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA