Peer Review History: Introduction to Farm Machinery Innovations towards Enhancing Crop Yield for Small Holdings

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. P. Chindaprasirt, Khon Kaen University, Thailand and Academy of Science, Royal Society of Thailand, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yogesh Kumar Kosariya, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

(3) Mahmoud Okasha, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar Kosariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahmoud Okasha, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Productivity and Livelihoods of Farm Women through Ecologically Safe Integrated Crop Management Practices in Ridge Gourd

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Sonam Roy, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohammad Halim Khan, Bundelkhand University, India.

(3) Zakia Himeur, INRA Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitamoni Bhattacharyya, Biswanath College, India.

(2) Khushbu Sharma, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sonam Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Halim Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zakia Himeur, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biofortification in Horticultural Crops: Breeding and Biotechnological Approaches for Nutritional Security

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinow,Institute of Chemical Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

(2) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Rasha Ahmed Hashim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Pooja Dubey, Institute of Medical Sciences BHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Raza, Korea National University of Transportation KNUT, South Korea.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rasha Ahmed Hashim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Ectopic Pregnancy Among Women of Reproductive Age in Abia State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sriram Seshadri,Institutional Ethical Committee, Institute of Science, Nirma University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Onuoha Chinyere Favour, Redeemer’s University, Nigeria.

(2) Sudhanshu Shukla, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Biradar, Khaja Bhandanawaz university, India.

(2) Madhu Shivhare, College of Veterinary Science and AH, NDVSU, India.

(3) Priyanka Biradar, Khaja Bhandanawaz university, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Onuoha Chinyere Favour, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhanshu Shukla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Associations between Groundwater Quality and Soil Physico-Chemical Properties under Tube-Well and Sewage Irrigation in the Gird Region of Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Milad Edraki, National University of Skills , Iran.

(2) Aabil Husain, Prestige Institute of Management & Research, India.

(3) Ali Khazraei Vizhemehr, University Canada West, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhay Kumar Jha, Lakshmi Narain college of Technology, India.
Ardalan afrasiabian, Austria.

(2) Mahamat Nour Abdallah, University of N’Djamena, Chad.

(3) Nanje Mosere Felicia, Cameroon.

(4) Nsima A. Akpan, Ritman University, Nigeria.

(5) Roger Saint-Fort, Mount Royal University, Canada.

(6) Sudarshan.P, SDM College Ujire, India.

(7) Tarini Chandrasekahr, Government Degree College Tekkali, Indian.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milad Edraki, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aabil Husain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Khazraei Vizhemehr, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Management of Fusarium Wilt in Onion through Phytosanitary Treatments and Fertilization Modes in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Carlos Prosperi, Blas Pascal University, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Yuvarani Rajendiran, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, India.

(2) Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Vegetable Research and Development Station, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yuvarani Rajendiran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Natural Disasters on Community Welfare

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Noble JebaKumar A, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Quyen Do, Van Lang University, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alina Ndeapo Uugwanga, Namibia.

(2) Bunga Aprillia, Padjajaran University, Indonesia.

(3) Emmanuel Nwokah, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(4) Febrina Nur Ramadhani, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(5) Jocelyn O. Jintalan, Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges, Philippines.

(6) Luiz Roberto Nascimento, UNIFIEO, Brazil.

(7) M.K.Ganeshan, Amet University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noble Jeba Kumar A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quyen Do, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Nutritional Significance of Sulfur in Pulse Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ammar Jassim Al-Khaz’Ali, Iraq.

(2) Roman Bohuslavskyi, Yuryev Plant Production Institute, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ammar Jassim Al-Khaz’Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roman Bohuslavskyi, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solvent extraction of zinc (II) using Alamine 336 and TBP: removal of zinc from gold mining waste

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. SungCheal Moon, Industrial Technology Support Division, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Malik, IFTM University, India.

(2) Mehdi Hosseini, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amr Ahmed Mostafa, Alexandria University, Egypt.

(2) Kailash Kumar, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Meeta Trivedi, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja Malik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehdi Hosseini, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Processing-induced Variations in Heavy Metal Content of Periwinkle (Tympanotonus fuscatus): Blowout Versus Shelling Method and Health Risk Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jorge Castro Mejía, Xochimlco Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Guruprashanth N, Jain Institute Of Techn Ology, INDIA.

(2) Pegah Gheshlaghi, University of Hormozgan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benjamín Valladares Carranza, Mexico.

(2) Sharvari Nilesh Kudtarkar, Mumbai University, India.

(3) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guruprashanth N, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pegah Gheshlaghi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA