Peer Review History: Adrenal Insufficiency in Pregnancy: A Rare but Easily Overlooked Emergency in Obstetric Practice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Nuri Duran, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University , Turkiye.

(2) Ayushi Sharma, Shri Swami Bhumanand College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lwasa Joel Njagala Calls, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) Mohammad Nasar, National Research Institute of Unani Medicine for Skin Disorders, India.

(3) V.Suryaprabha, Aimst, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Nuri Duran, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayushi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neuroendocrinological Diseases in the Municipality of Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil: A Retrospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Mahmood Shahidul Islam, Bangladesh.

(2) Hala Saad Bash, College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

(3) Ian James Martins, Edith Cowan University, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farhang Salehi, Iran.

(2) Karthik S, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Mahmood Shahidul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hala Saad Bash, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ian James Martins, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Natural and Synthetic Mosquito Repellents: Efficacy, Safety, Formulation Challenges and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjit Singh, Bihar College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Rodrigo Andrés Sarria Villa, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.

(3) John Aondoaseer Jia, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adedeji Timothy ADESIPO, Federal University Oye Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Reem Mohammed Obaid, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Ştefan Ţălu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjit Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rodrigo Andrés Sarria Villa, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (John Aondoaseer Jia, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Profile of Temperature and Relative Humidity and Measure of Evapotranspiration in Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek.) Crop under Semi-Arid Region of Haryana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Srinivasa Reddy, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajashree Khatua, Odisha university of agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sathya Kannan, USA.

(2) Yulia Kostogorova-Beller, Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship 2.0 (RIIS 2.0), USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Srinivasa Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajashree Khatua, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post-Cesarean Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramiro Cabrera Carranco, Mexico.

(2) Sameh Mohamed Ahmed Eissa Salem Hadhoud, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN UNIVERISTY) , Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhakti Patil, JNMC, India.

(2) Hrishikesh Munshi, ICMR-NIRRCH, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramiro Cabrera Carranco, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sameh Mohamed Ahmed Eissa Salem Hadhoud, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Accuracy of Intraoperative Gross Visual Assessment of Myometrial Invasion and Tumour Size to Guide Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Single Center Study in Sarawak, Malaysia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

(2) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Chile.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Ahmed Mohamed Aydarous Emam, AlAzhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arjan Aydin Zeynel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Daniel James, Nigeria.

(3) Sushma Desai, Gitam University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Mohamed Aydarous Emam, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: School Leaders’ Mentoring Skills, Motivation and Management Skills as Predictors of Teacher Support

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Harikrishnan M, Sanskriti University, India.

(2) Ngeso Aketch, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rich Paulo S. Lim, FEU Pampanga, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harikrishnan M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ngeso Aketch, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Public Relations Strategies in Assisting Corporate Reputation in Algeria in the Food Business

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Renil Septiano, Indonesia.

(2) Previledge Garikai Madhovi, Tshwane University of Technology (TuT), South Africa.

(3) Ahmad Mahmoud Ahmad Zamil, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Idowu Ojo, Elizade University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Renil Septiano, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Previledge Garikai Madhovi, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmad Mahmoud Ahmad Zamil, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report on Multiple Tumors in a Giant Bladder Diverticula

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivaraj Annigeri, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Bangalore, India.

(2) Mehrangiz Ghabimi, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sushanto Neogi, Maulana Azad Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivaraj Annigeri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehrangiz Ghabimi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Combined eCG and Testosterone Enanthate (TE) Hormonal Treatments on Litter Size and Kit Weight in Rabbits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Vijaya Anand, Bharathiar University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadjia Hammouche, University of Sciences and Technology, Algeria.

(2) Mithat Direk, Selçuk University, Türkiye.

(3) Saqib Kakar ( Jalalzai), Sindh Agricultural University , Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anas A. Salem, Assiut University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadjia Hammouche, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mithat Direk, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saqib Kakar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA