Peer Review History: Wisdom Tooth Surgery: A Two-Cycle Clinical Audit of Post-Operative Complications and Antibiotic Stewardship

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Konda Karthik Roy, Harkan Dental Clinic, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Rahul Sarda, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Diwakar Vasudev, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divyashree.P, MES Dental College affiliated to KUHS, India.

(2) Muhannad Ali Kashmoola, Bilad Alrafidain University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Rahul Sarda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diwakar Vasudev, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and Coal Fly Ash on Soil pH and Nitrogen Status in Post-coal Mining Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Zaid Ahmad Babanlungu, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.

(2) Subrata Mandal, Visva-Bharati University, India.

(3) Yurii Dehtiarov, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mintu Ann Varghese, Mahatma Gandhi University, India

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zaid Ahmad Babanlungu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subrata Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yurii Dehtiarov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Niharika Bharti, J. L. College, B. R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

(2) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niharika Bharti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heat Stress and Climate Vulnerability among Farm Women Engaged in Cucurbit Cultivation: An Environmental Physiology Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng , National United University (NUU) and President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pașcalău rau, University of life sciences” king mihai i” , Romania.

(2) Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Murnee Daoh, Songkhla Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(2) Chiam CC, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pașcalău rau, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Online Purchase Decisions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Radhiahtul Raehan Mustafa, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Sudeepta Raha, Assam University, India.

(3) M. B. Suvarchala, Krishna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Diogo Dantas, Portucalense University, Portugal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radhiahtul Raehan Mustafa, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudeepta Raha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. B. Suvarchala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Different Sulphur Levels and Application Methods on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yields of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Irrigated Conditions of Rajasthan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Patel Harsh Nareshbhai, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nilotpal Das, GLA University, India.

(3) Bikram Pradhan , Guidance English Medium School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bushra Mahmood alwan, Iraq.

(2) Mahmoud Abdulkader Alghafri, Damascus University, Syrian Arab Republic.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Patel Harsh Nareshbhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilotpal Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bikram Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ergonomic Evaluation of Drudgery and Cardiovascular Stress among Farm Women in Cucurbit Cultivation under Pandal Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Arild Saether, Netherlands.

(2) Satish Kanhyalal Pimpale, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hendrik, Health Polytechnic of Makassar, Indonesia.

(2) Tthingithu Mailutha, Kisii University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arild Saether, Netherlands) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satish Kanhyalal Pimpale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Melatonin: A Comprehensive Review of Pharmacological Uses and Recent Advances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akihiro Nakamura, Japan.

(2) Maya Kalyani Srivathsan, Dr Dy Patil School of Medicine, India.

(3) Amitava Khan, Sonarpur Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akihiro Nakamura, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maya Kalyani Srivathsan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amitava Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change TO JPRI FROM JAMMR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive and Progressive Evidence-Based Physiotherapy for Lateral Epicondylitis in a Female Domestic Worker: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran,BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeti Christian, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Kanchan Kholiya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Dasari, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, India.

(2) Mukesh Shinde, Dr. Ulhas Patil College of Physiotherapy, India.

(3) Shreya Upadhyay, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, SPB Physiotherapy College, India.

(4) Somsankar Mukherjee, IGTAMSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeti Christian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kanchan Kholiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Market Access as the Missing Link: How Structured and Pooled Procurement Can Unlock Nigeria’s Health Manufacturing Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kumsa Negasa Regasa, Ethiopia.

(2) Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh.

(3) Priyanka Joshi, Pal College of Nursing and Medical Sciences , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Uttam Khanal, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kumsa Negasa Regasa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA